TY - JOUR
T1 - A pooled analysis of individual patient data from National Clinical Trials Network clinical trials of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer in elderly patients versus younger patients
AU - Stinchcombe, Thomas E.
AU - Fan, Wen
AU - Schild, Steven E.
AU - Vokes, Everett E.
AU - Bogart, Jeff
AU - Le, Quynh Thu
AU - Thomas, Charles R.
AU - Edelman, Martin J.
AU - Horn, Leora
AU - Komaki, Ritsuko
AU - Cohen, Harvey J.
AU - Kishor Ganti, Apar
AU - Pang, Herbert
AU - Wang, Xiaofei
N1 - Funding Information:
Apar Kishor Ganti reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer; grants from New Link Genetics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Janssen, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and personal fees from Ariad Pharmaceuticals and Biodesix outside the submitted work. Steven E. Schild reports personal fees from Noxopharm and UpToDate outside the submitted work.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R21-AG042894 to Apar Kishor Ganti, Herbert Pang, Thomas E. Stinchcombe, Everett E. Vokes, and Xiaofei Wang and grant 5P30CA014236-44 to Wen Fan and Xiaofei Wang).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Cancer Society
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Background: Platinum and etoposide with thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation constitute the standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Many patients with LS-SCLC are elderly with comorbidities. Methods: Individual patient data were collected from 11 phase 2 or 3 trials for LS-SCLC conducted by the National Clinical Trials Network and activated from 1990 to 2010. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the rate of severe adverse events, and off-treatment reasons. The outcomes were compared for patients 70 years old or older (elderly patients) and patients younger than 70 years (younger patients). Results: Individual patient data from 1049 younger patients (81%) and 254 elderly patients (19%) were analyzed. In the multivariate model, elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.63; median OS for elderly patients, 17.8 months; OS for younger patients, 23.5 months) and worse PFS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39; median PFS for elderly patients, 10.6 months; median PFS for younger patients, 12.3 months). Elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, experienced more grade 5 adverse events (8% vs 3%; P <.01) and more grade 3 or higher dyspnea (11% vs 7%; P =.03) but less grade 3 or higher esophagitis/dysphagia (14% vs 19%; P =.04) and less grade 3 or higher vomiting (11% vs 17%; P =.01). Elderly patients completed treatment less often, discontinued treatment because of adverse events and patient refusal more frequently, and died during treatment more frequently. Conclusions: Elderly patients with LS-SCLC have worse PFS and OS and more difficulty in tolerating therapy. Future trials should incorporate assessments of elderly patients, novel monitoring of adverse events, and more tolerable radiation and systemic therapies.
AB - Background: Platinum and etoposide with thoracic radiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation constitute the standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Many patients with LS-SCLC are elderly with comorbidities. Methods: Individual patient data were collected from 11 phase 2 or 3 trials for LS-SCLC conducted by the National Clinical Trials Network and activated from 1990 to 2010. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the rate of severe adverse events, and off-treatment reasons. The outcomes were compared for patients 70 years old or older (elderly patients) and patients younger than 70 years (younger patients). Results: Individual patient data from 1049 younger patients (81%) and 254 elderly patients (19%) were analyzed. In the multivariate model, elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.63; median OS for elderly patients, 17.8 months; OS for younger patients, 23.5 months) and worse PFS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.39; median PFS for elderly patients, 10.6 months; median PFS for younger patients, 12.3 months). Elderly patients, in comparison with younger patients, experienced more grade 5 adverse events (8% vs 3%; P <.01) and more grade 3 or higher dyspnea (11% vs 7%; P =.03) but less grade 3 or higher esophagitis/dysphagia (14% vs 19%; P =.04) and less grade 3 or higher vomiting (11% vs 17%; P =.01). Elderly patients completed treatment less often, discontinued treatment because of adverse events and patient refusal more frequently, and died during treatment more frequently. Conclusions: Elderly patients with LS-SCLC have worse PFS and OS and more difficulty in tolerating therapy. Future trials should incorporate assessments of elderly patients, novel monitoring of adverse events, and more tolerable radiation and systemic therapies.
KW - adverse events related to age
KW - chemotherapy
KW - clinical trial
KW - small cell lung cancer
KW - thoracic radiation therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055249450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055249450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.31813
DO - 10.1002/cncr.31813
M3 - Article
C2 - 30343497
AN - SCOPUS:85055249450
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 125
SP - 382
EP - 390
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 3
ER -