TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Hospital Discharge and Home Follow-up of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
AU - Brooten, Dorothy
AU - Kumar, Savitri
AU - Brown, Linda P.
AU - Butts, Priscilla
AU - Finkler, Steven A.
AU - Bakewell-Sachs, Susan
AU - Gibbons, Ann
AU - Delivoria-Papadopoulos, Maria
PY - 1986/10/9
Y1 - 1986/10/9
N2 - To determine the safety, efficacy, and cost savings of early hospital discharge of very-low-birth-weight infants (≤1500 g), we randomly assigned infants to one of two groups. Infants in the control group (n = 40) were discharged according to routine nursery criteria, which included a weight of about 2200 g. Those in the early-discharge group (n = 39) were discharged before they reached this weight if they met a standard set of conditions. For families of infants in the early-discharge group, instruction, counseling, home visits, and daily on-call availability of a hospital-based nurse specialist for 18 months were provided. Infants in the early-discharge group were discharged a mean of 11 days earlier, weighed 200 g less, and were two weeks younger at discharge than control infants. The mean hospital charge for the early-discharge group was 27 percent less than that for the control group ($47,520 vs. $64,940; P<0.01), and the mean physician's charge was 22 percent less ($5,933 vs. $7,649; P<0.01). The mean cost of the home follow-up care in the early-discharge group was $576, yielding a net saving of $18,560 for each infant. The two groups did not differ in the numbers of rehospitalizations and acute care visits, or in measures of physical and mental growth. We conclude that early discharge of very-low-birth-weight infants, with follow-up care in the home by a nurse specialist, is safe and cost effective. (N Engl J Med 1986; 315:934–9.), More than 230,000 low-birth-weight infants are born annually in the United States, and more than 36,000 of these infants weigh less than 1500 g.1 2 3 4 5 6 In addition, the proportion of live births made up by infants weighing less than 1500 g has changed little in the past several decades.7,8 Although advances in neonatal intensive care have been credited with reducing mortality and morbidity in this group,9,11 recent studies suggest that the environment of the neonatal intensive care unit — with its bright lights and high noise levels — may have a permanent adverse effect on an infant's hearing, vision, and motor….
AB - To determine the safety, efficacy, and cost savings of early hospital discharge of very-low-birth-weight infants (≤1500 g), we randomly assigned infants to one of two groups. Infants in the control group (n = 40) were discharged according to routine nursery criteria, which included a weight of about 2200 g. Those in the early-discharge group (n = 39) were discharged before they reached this weight if they met a standard set of conditions. For families of infants in the early-discharge group, instruction, counseling, home visits, and daily on-call availability of a hospital-based nurse specialist for 18 months were provided. Infants in the early-discharge group were discharged a mean of 11 days earlier, weighed 200 g less, and were two weeks younger at discharge than control infants. The mean hospital charge for the early-discharge group was 27 percent less than that for the control group ($47,520 vs. $64,940; P<0.01), and the mean physician's charge was 22 percent less ($5,933 vs. $7,649; P<0.01). The mean cost of the home follow-up care in the early-discharge group was $576, yielding a net saving of $18,560 for each infant. The two groups did not differ in the numbers of rehospitalizations and acute care visits, or in measures of physical and mental growth. We conclude that early discharge of very-low-birth-weight infants, with follow-up care in the home by a nurse specialist, is safe and cost effective. (N Engl J Med 1986; 315:934–9.), More than 230,000 low-birth-weight infants are born annually in the United States, and more than 36,000 of these infants weigh less than 1500 g.1 2 3 4 5 6 In addition, the proportion of live births made up by infants weighing less than 1500 g has changed little in the past several decades.7,8 Although advances in neonatal intensive care have been credited with reducing mortality and morbidity in this group,9,11 recent studies suggest that the environment of the neonatal intensive care unit — with its bright lights and high noise levels — may have a permanent adverse effect on an infant's hearing, vision, and motor….
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022517552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022517552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198610093151505
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198610093151505
M3 - Article
C2 - 3531852
AN - SCOPUS:0022517552
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 315
SP - 934
EP - 939
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 15
ER -