TY - JOUR
T1 - Achieving health equity in preventive services
T2 - A systematic review for a national institutes of health pathways to prevention workshop
AU - Nelson, Heidi D.
AU - Cantor, Amy
AU - Wagner, Jesse
AU - Jungbauer, Rebecca
AU - Quiñones, Ana
AU - Stillman, Lucy
AU - Kondo, Karli
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial Support: This report is based on research conducted under contract to the AHRQ, Rockville, Maryland (contract 290-2015-00009I), and funded by the NIH Office of Disease Prevention.
Funding Information:
National Institutes of Health Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018109263) The investigators acknowledge the contributions of Lionel L. Ba?ez, MD, AHRQ Task Order Officer; NIH partners; technical expert panel members; peer reviewers; Somnath Saha, MD, MPH, content expert; Tracy Dana, MLS, librarian; Bernadette Zakher, MBBS, MPH, research associate; and Melanie Timmins and Rachel Lockard, MPH, student research assistants. This report is based on research conducted under contract to the AHRQ, Rockville, Maryland (contract 290-2015-00009I), and funded by the NIH Office of Disease Prevention.
Funding Information:
This review was funded by the NIH Office of Disease Prevention through an interagency agreement with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (contract 290-2015-00009I). Agency staff, an NIH Office of Disease Prevention working group, an NIH content area expert group, and a technical expert panel helped refine the project scope. The draft report was presented at an NIH Office of Disease Prevention Pathways to Prevention workshop. Experts in the field, AHRQ and NIH partners, and the public reviewed earlier drafts of the full technical report. The investigators are solely responsible for the contents of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/18
Y1 - 2020/2/18
N2 - Background: Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. Purpose: To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. Data Sources: English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. Study Selection: Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. Data Synthesis: No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient–provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. Limitation: Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. Conclusion: In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening.
AB - Background: Disadvantaged populations in the United States experience disparities in the use of preventive health services. Purpose: To examine effects of barriers that create health disparities in 10 recommended preventive services for adults, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce them. Data Sources: English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and the Veterans Affairs Health Services database (1 January 1996 to 5 July 2019); reference lists. Study Selection: Trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and systematic reviews of populations adversely affected by disparities that reported effects of barriers on use of any of the 10 selected preventive services or that reported the effectiveness of interventions to reduce disparities in use of a preventive service by improving intermediate or clinical outcomes. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and assessment of study quality, strength of evidence, and evidence applicability. Data Synthesis: No studies reported effects of provider-specific barriers on preventive service use. Eighteen studies reporting effects of patient barriers, such as insurance coverage or lack of a regular provider, on preventive service use had mixed and inconclusive findings. Studies of patient–provider interventions (n = 12), health information technologies (n = 11), and health system interventions (n = 88) indicated higher cancer screening rates with patient navigation; telephone calls, prompts, and other outreach methods; reminders involving lay health workers; patient education; risk assessment, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training. Single studies showed that clinician-delivered and technology-assisted interventions improved rates of smoking cessation and weight loss, respectively. Limitation: Insufficient or low strength of evidence and applicability for most interventions except patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers. Conclusion: In populations adversely affected by disparities, patient navigation, telephone calls and prompts, and reminders involving lay health workers increase cancer screening.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082133798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082133798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M19-3199
DO - 10.7326/M19-3199
M3 - Article
C2 - 31931527
AN - SCOPUS:85082133798
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 172
SP - 258
EP - 271
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 4
ER -