After Oregon's insanity defense:. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

Joseph D. Bloom; Jeffrey L. Rogers; Spero M. Manson

doi:10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

After Oregon's insanity defense:. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

Joseph D. Bloom, Jeffrey L. Rogers, Spero M. Manson

Pediatrics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	391-402
Number of pages	12
Journal	International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume	5
Issue number	3-4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2
State	Published - 1982

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Psychiatry and Mental health
Law

Access to Document

10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

Cite this

@article{f08c7cd3300f434e9eaa94da35363efb,

title = "After Oregon's insanity defense:. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization",

abstract = "This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?",

author = "Bloom, {Joseph D.} and Rogers, {Jeffrey L.} and Manson, {Spero M.}",

note = "Funding Information: *Professor, **Adjunct Assistant Professor, t**Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, 3181 SW. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon, 97201. This work is supported in part by NIMH grant MH 13462-08. The authors wish to thank the staff of the Psychiatric Security Review Board for their help in gathering material for this project, and Linda Grounds, M.S., and Ms. Susan Hines for their work in data analysis.",

year = "1982",

doi = "10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "5",

pages = "391--402",

journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",

issn = "0160-2527",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - After Oregon's insanity defense:. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

AU - Bloom, Joseph D.

AU - Rogers, Jeffrey L.

AU - Manson, Spero M.

N1 - Funding Information: *Professor, **Adjunct Assistant Professor, t**Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, 3181 SW. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon, 97201. This work is supported in part by NIMH grant MH 13462-08. The authors wish to thank the staff of the Psychiatric Security Review Board for their help in gathering material for this project, and Linda Grounds, M.S., and Ms. Susan Hines for their work in data analysis.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

AB - This paper is one in a series of reports on the characteristics of persons committed to the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) and their treatment and disposition while subject to its jurisdiction. For the purpose of this discussion, we have focused on conditional release and attempt to answer a number of questions. How do the individuals who are placed in the community differ from those who remain hospitalized? Do the two mechanisms of conditional release in this system, by judges or the PSRB, differ in terms of the kinds of people that they are likely to release? Lastly, what features distinguish those individuals who manage to succeed in their release plans from those who do not?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020351588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020351588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

DO - 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90032-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 7184882

AN - SCOPUS:0020351588

SN - 0160-2527

VL - 5

SP - 391

EP - 402

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

IS - 3-4

ER -

After Oregon's insanity defense:. A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this