TY - JOUR
T1 - AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 7
T2 - PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation
AU - Complex Interventions Workgroup
AU - Guise, Jeanne Marie
AU - Butler, Mary
AU - Chang, Christine
AU - Viswanathan, Meera
AU - Pigott, Terri
AU - Tugwell, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was funded by the following contracts HHSA290201200004C, HHSA290201200016I, and HHSA290201500011I from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Background Complex interventions are widely used in health care, public health, education, criminology, social work, business, and welfare. They have increasingly become the subject of systematic reviews and are challenging to effectively report. The Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup developed an extension to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Complex Interventions (PRISMA-CI). Rationale Following the EQUATOR Network guidance for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions, this Explanation and Elaboration (EE) document accompanies the PRISMA-CI checklist to promote consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Discussions The EE document explains the meaning and rationale for each unique PRISMA-CI checklist item and provides examples to assist systematic review authors in operationalizing PRISMA-CI guidance. The Complex Interventions Workgroup developed PRISMA-CI as an important start toward increased consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Because the field is rapidly expanding, the Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup plans to re-evaluate periodically for the need to add increasing specificity and examples as the field matures.
AB - Background Complex interventions are widely used in health care, public health, education, criminology, social work, business, and welfare. They have increasingly become the subject of systematic reviews and are challenging to effectively report. The Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup developed an extension to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Complex Interventions (PRISMA-CI). Rationale Following the EQUATOR Network guidance for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions, this Explanation and Elaboration (EE) document accompanies the PRISMA-CI checklist to promote consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Discussions The EE document explains the meaning and rationale for each unique PRISMA-CI checklist item and provides examples to assist systematic review authors in operationalizing PRISMA-CI guidance. The Complex Interventions Workgroup developed PRISMA-CI as an important start toward increased consistency in reporting of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Because the field is rapidly expanding, the Complex Interventions Methods Workgroup plans to re-evaluate periodically for the need to add increasing specificity and examples as the field matures.
KW - Complex interventions
KW - Evidence-based medicine
KW - Guidance as topic
KW - Health care interventions
KW - Publishing standards
KW - Research design
KW - Research report standards
KW - Review literature as topic
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025480848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025480848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 28720513
AN - SCOPUS:85025480848
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 90
SP - 51
EP - 58
JO - Journal of Chronic Diseases
JF - Journal of Chronic Diseases
ER -