Alternative Access for TAVR: Choosing the Right Pathway

Katherine Lutz, Karla M. Asturias, Jasmine Garg, Abhushan Poudyal, Gurion Lantz, Harsh Golwala, Julie Doberne, Amani Politano, Howard K. Song, Firas Zahr

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of surgical risk, particularly in those with a high and prohibitive risk. Since the advent of TAVR, transfemoral access has been the standard of care. However, given comorbidities and anatomical limitations, a proportion of patients are not good candidates for a transfemoral approach. Alternative access, including transapical, transaortic, transaxillary, transsubclavian, transcarotid, and transcaval, can be considered. Each alternative access has advantages and disadvantages, so the vascular route should be tailored to the patient’s characteristics. However, there is no standardized algorithm when choosing the optimal alternative vascular access. In this review, we analyzed the evolution and current evidence for the most common alternative access for TAVR and proposed an algorithm for choosing the optimal vascular access in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3386
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • alternative access
  • transaortic
  • transapical
  • transaxillary
  • transcarotid
  • transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • transsubclavian
  • vascular access

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative Access for TAVR: Choosing the Right Pathway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this