Analysis of Rod/Cone Gap Junctions from the Reconstruction of Mouse Photoreceptor Terminals

Munenori Ishibashi, Joyce Keung, Catherine W. Morgans, Sue A. Aicher, James R. Carroll, Joshua H. Singer, Li Jia, Wei Li, Iris Fahrenfort, Christophe P. Ribelayga, Stephen C. Massey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Electrical coupling, mediated by gap junctions, contributes to signal averaging, synchronization and noise reduction in neuronal circuits. In addition, gap junctions may also provide alternative neuronal pathways. However, because they are small and especially difficult to image, gap junctions are often ignored in large-scale 3D reconstructions. Here, we reconstruct gap junctions between photoreceptors in the mouse retina, using serial blockface-scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM), focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), and confocal microscopy for the gap junction protein Cx36. An exuberant spray of fine telodendria extends from each cone pedicle (including blue cones) to contact 40-50 nearby rod spherules at sites of Cx36 labeling, with approximately 50 Cx36 clusters per cone pedicle and 2-3 per rod spherule. We were unable to detect rod/rod or cone/cone coupling. Thus, rod/cone coupling accounts for nearly all gap junctions between photoreceptors. We estimate a mean of 86 Cx36 channels per rod/cone pair, which may provide a maximum conductance of ~ 1200 pS, if all gap junction channels were open. This is comparable to the maximum conductance previously measured between rod/cone pairs in the presence of a dopamine antagonist to activate Cx36, suggesting the open probability of gap junction channels can approach 100% under certain conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere73039
StatePublished - Apr 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • General Immunology and Microbiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of Rod/Cone Gap Junctions from the Reconstruction of Mouse Photoreceptor Terminals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this