Antigenic relationships on the diphtheria toxin molecule: antitoxin versus antitoxoid

M. B. Rittenberg, C. B.H. Tannert Pinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


The mouse was used to produce antisera to native diphtheria toxin and diphtheria toxoid. With these antisera it was possible to distinguish between toxin and toxoid. By gel diffusion analysis, antitoxin detected antigenic determinants on toxin which were not available on toxoid, indicating that some determinants had been lost or altered by formalin treatment. Antitoxoid, on the other hand, showed reactions of identity between toxin and toxoid in gel diffusion. The toxin neutralization titers measured in tissue culture were the same for both antisera. Only antitoxin neutralized the adenosine 5' diphosphate ribosyl transferase activity of fragment A, but suprisingly both antisera had significant antifragment A titers when tested by passive hemagglutination. It is suggested that some of the anti fragment A activity in antitoxin effects the enzyme active site, whereas that in antitoxoid does not, implying the existence of at least 2 independent antigenic regions on fragment A.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)122-128
Number of pages7
JournalInfection and Immunity
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1976
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Parasitology
  • Microbiology
  • Immunology
  • Infectious Diseases


Dive into the research topics of 'Antigenic relationships on the diphtheria toxin molecule: antitoxin versus antitoxoid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this