Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are repeat prostate biopsies safe? A cohort analysis from the SEARCH database

  • Ryan P. Kopp
  • , Sean P. Stroup
  • , Florian R. Schroeck
  • , Stephen J. Freedland
  • , Frederick Millard
  • , Martha K. Terris
  • , William J. Aronson
  • , Joseph C. Presti
  • , Christopher L. Amling
  • , Christopher J. Kane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Patients question whether multiple biopsy sessions cause worse prostate cancer outcomes. Therefore, we investigated whether there is an association between the number of prior biopsy sessions and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Men in the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) database who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2010 after a known number of prior biopsies were included in the analysis. Number of biopsy sessions (range 1 to 8) was examined as a continuous and categorical (1, 2 and 3 to 8) variable. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a prostate specific antigen greater than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 values at 0.2 ng/ml or secondary treatment for an increased prostate specific antigen. The association between number of prior biopsy sessions and biochemical recurrence was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from biochemical recurrence were compared among the groups. Results: Of the 2,739 men in the SEARCH database who met the inclusion criteria 2,251 (82%) had only 1 biopsy, 365(13%) had 2 biopsies and 123 (5%) had 3 or more biopsies. More biopsy sessions were associated with higher prostate specific antigen (p <0.001), greater prostate weight (p <0.001), lower biopsy Gleason sum (p = 0.01) and more organ confined (pT2) disease (p = 0.017). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated no association between number of biopsy sessions as a continuous or categorical variable and biochemical recurrence. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from biochemical recurrence were similar across biopsy groups (log rank p = 0.211). Conclusions: Multiple biopsy sessions are not associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Multiple biopsy sessions appear to select for a low risk cohort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2056-2060
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume187
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Funding

Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Research Program (SJF), NIH R01CA100938 (WJA), NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Grant P50 CA92131-01A1 (WJA), Georgia Cancer Coalition (MKT) and the American Urological Association Foundation/Astellas Rising Star in Urology Award (SJF). Views and opinions of and endorsements by the author(s) do not reflect those of the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy or the Department of Defense.

FundersFunder number
American Urological Association Foundation Astellas Rising Star
MKT
Author National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health The Bev Hartig Huntington's Disease Foundation National Institutes of HealthR01CA100938, P50 CA92131-01A1
U.S. Department of Defense
National Institute of Health-National Cancer InstituteP50CA092131
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Georgia Cancer Coalition
DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program
Sweden-Japan Foundation

    Keywords

    • biopsy
    • diagnosis
    • prostatectomy
    • prostatic neoplasms
    • recurrence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Urology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are repeat prostate biopsies safe? A cohort analysis from the SEARCH database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this