TY - JOUR
T1 - Are there lessons to be learned from drug development that will accelerate the use of molecular imaging probes in the clinic?
AU - Eckelman, William C.
AU - Rohatagi, Shashank
AU - Krohn, Kenneth A.
AU - Vera, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The meeting was supported by Biogen IDEC; Bracco; The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environment Research; Eastern Isotopes; GE Healthcare; Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals; Neoprobe; Pfizer; Sanyko Pharma; Siemens Medical Solutions USA; Society of Nuclear Medicine; Tyco Healthcare; and University of California–San Diego.
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - This special issue of the journal contains contributions from participants of the third La Jolla meeting (The Magic Bullet: A Century Later). The goal of this meeting was twofold: to review approaches to validating molecular imaging agents and to review the progress in advancing the use of molecular imaging from the bench to the bedside, with a special emphasis on how molecular imaging improves patient care and management. Drug development has changed its focus over the years. The original approach depended on direct measurements in patients, whereby, in many cases, the drug was advanced to an NDA based on physiological results (e.g., lowering blood pressure) without identifying a target. Over the past decade, the focus has been on validating a target and choosing the lead compound using combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening, often at the expense of a focus on the biology of diseases. On the other hand, molecular imaging has been target based since its beginning because of the requirements dictated by external imaging (i.e., a target-to-nontarget ratio). This article explores the possible analogies between current targeted drug development and molecular imaging-targeted probe development with the goal of better defining the path to new molecular imaging probes for the clinic.
AB - This special issue of the journal contains contributions from participants of the third La Jolla meeting (The Magic Bullet: A Century Later). The goal of this meeting was twofold: to review approaches to validating molecular imaging agents and to review the progress in advancing the use of molecular imaging from the bench to the bedside, with a special emphasis on how molecular imaging improves patient care and management. Drug development has changed its focus over the years. The original approach depended on direct measurements in patients, whereby, in many cases, the drug was advanced to an NDA based on physiological results (e.g., lowering blood pressure) without identifying a target. Over the past decade, the focus has been on validating a target and choosing the lead compound using combinatorial chemistry and high throughput screening, often at the expense of a focus on the biology of diseases. On the other hand, molecular imaging has been target based since its beginning because of the requirements dictated by external imaging (i.e., a target-to-nontarget ratio). This article explores the possible analogies between current targeted drug development and molecular imaging-targeted probe development with the goal of better defining the path to new molecular imaging probes for the clinic.
KW - Molecular imaging
KW - Radioligands
KW - Receptor binding radiotracer
KW - Translational medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144466406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144466406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.06.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16243639
AN - SCOPUS:27144466406
SN - 0969-8051
VL - 32
SP - 657
EP - 662
JO - International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology
JF - International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology
IS - 7
ER -