TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between treatment setting and outcomes among oregon medicaid patients with opioid use disorder
T2 - a retrospective cohort study
AU - Hartung, Daniel M.
AU - Markwardt, Sheila
AU - Johnston, Kirbee
AU - Geddes, Jonah
AU - Baker, Robin
AU - Leichtling, Gillian
AU - Hildebran, Christi
AU - Chan, Brian
AU - Cook, Ryan R.
AU - McCarty, Dennis
AU - Ghitza, Udi
AU - Korthuis, P. Todd
N1 - Funding Information:
The opinions expressed in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Udi Ghitza’s role in this study was as NIDA Project Scientist (Scientific Officer), and Dr. Ghitza has not had and will not have any programmatic involvement with non-cooperative agreement grants cited.
Funding Information:
This project was supported through grants from the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse (UG1DA015815, UH3DA044831) and Centers for Disease Control (U01 CE00278).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Residential treatment is a common approach for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), however, few studies have directly compared it to outpatient treatment. The objective of this study was to compare OUD outcomes among individuals receiving residential and outpatient treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study used linked data from a state Medicaid program, vital statistics, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Treatment Episodes Dataset (TEDS) to compare OUD-related health outcomes among individuals treated in a residential or outpatient setting between 2014 and 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models examined the association between treatment setting and outcomes (i.e., opioid overdose, non-overdose opioid-related and all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and treatment retention) controlling for patient characteristics, co-morbidities, and use of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Interaction models evaluated how MOUD use modified associations between treatment setting and outcomes. Results: Of 3293 individuals treated for OUD, 957 (29%) received treatment in a residential facility. MOUD use was higher among those treated as an outpatient (43%) compared to residential (19%). The risk of opioid overdose (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 0.73–2.64) or an opioid-related emergency department encounter or admission (aHR 1.02; 95% CI 0.80–1.29) did not differ between treatment settings. Independent of setting, MOUD use was associated with a significant reduction in overdose risk (aHR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23–0.89). Residential care was associated with greater odds of retention at 6-months (aOR 1.71; 95% CI 1.32–2.21) but not 1-year. Residential treatment was only associated with improved retention for individuals not receiving MOUD (6-month aOR 2.05; 95% CI 1.56–2.71) with no benefit observed in those who received MOUD (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.46–1.29; interaction p = 0.001). Conclusions: Relative to outpatient treatment, residential treatment was not associated with reductions in opioid overdose or opioid-related ED encounters/hospitalizations. Regardless of setting, MOUD use was associated with a significant reduction in opioid overdose risk.
AB - Background: Residential treatment is a common approach for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), however, few studies have directly compared it to outpatient treatment. The objective of this study was to compare OUD outcomes among individuals receiving residential and outpatient treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study used linked data from a state Medicaid program, vital statistics, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Treatment Episodes Dataset (TEDS) to compare OUD-related health outcomes among individuals treated in a residential or outpatient setting between 2014 and 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models examined the association between treatment setting and outcomes (i.e., opioid overdose, non-overdose opioid-related and all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and treatment retention) controlling for patient characteristics, co-morbidities, and use of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Interaction models evaluated how MOUD use modified associations between treatment setting and outcomes. Results: Of 3293 individuals treated for OUD, 957 (29%) received treatment in a residential facility. MOUD use was higher among those treated as an outpatient (43%) compared to residential (19%). The risk of opioid overdose (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 0.73–2.64) or an opioid-related emergency department encounter or admission (aHR 1.02; 95% CI 0.80–1.29) did not differ between treatment settings. Independent of setting, MOUD use was associated with a significant reduction in overdose risk (aHR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23–0.89). Residential care was associated with greater odds of retention at 6-months (aOR 1.71; 95% CI 1.32–2.21) but not 1-year. Residential treatment was only associated with improved retention for individuals not receiving MOUD (6-month aOR 2.05; 95% CI 1.56–2.71) with no benefit observed in those who received MOUD (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.46–1.29; interaction p = 0.001). Conclusions: Relative to outpatient treatment, residential treatment was not associated with reductions in opioid overdose or opioid-related ED encounters/hospitalizations. Regardless of setting, MOUD use was associated with a significant reduction in opioid overdose risk.
KW - Medications for opioid use disorder
KW - Opioid use disorder
KW - Residential treatment
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136991560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136991560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13722-022-00318-1
DO - 10.1186/s13722-022-00318-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 35986384
AN - SCOPUS:85136991560
SN - 1940-0632
VL - 17
JO - Addiction science & clinical practice
JF - Addiction science & clinical practice
IS - 1
M1 - 45
ER -