TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular remodeling and myocardial performance with modified task force criteria in adolescents with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
AU - Pieles, Guido E.
AU - Grosse-Wortmann, Lars
AU - Hader, Majeda
AU - Fatah, Meena
AU - Chungsomprasong, Paweena
AU - Slorach, Cameron
AU - Hui, Wei
AU - Fan, Chun Po Steve
AU - Manlhiot, Cedric
AU - Mertens, Luc
AU - Hamilton, Robert
AU - Friedberg, Mark K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
Dr Pieles was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Lectureship at the NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre and a Labatt Family Heart Centre Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: The usefulness of echocardiographic indices, including those already used by modified Task Force Criteria (mTFC), and others such as strain imaging, to identify arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in adolescence is not well established. METHODS: Echocardiograms from 120 adolescents investigated for ARVC (13±4 years) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the mTFC, patients were classified into definite (n=38), borderline (n=39), or possible (n=43) ARVC. Results were compared with 35 healthy controls. mTFC echocardiographic parameters were analyzed, as well as comprehensive right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular assessment of function including parameters not included in mTFC such as pulsed-wave tissue Doppler and RV 2-dimensional speckle strain. RESULTS: mTFC parameters indexed for body surface area were significantly more abnormal in patients with possible, borderline, or definite ARVC compared with controls for parasternal long-axis view of the RV outflow tract. RV end-diastolic diameters were significantly larger in patients versus controls, a difference that increased with likelihood of ARVC. Left ventricular ejection fraction, tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion, and systolic and diastolic pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging indices were similar to controls for all groups. Average and segmental RV peak longitudinal systolic strain was significantly lower in patients with definite ARVC (−21±4%) and disease subgroups versus controls (−25±3%). Multivariable risk analysis showed that reduced RV strain was significantly associated with ARVC diagnosis and its likelihood (multivariable odds ratio [95% CI]=1.23 [1.1–1.37]; P<0.001) as was increased end-diastolic diameter at the apical third of the RV (multivariable odds ratio [95% CI]=1.51 [1.33–1.72]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: mTFC echocardiographic criteria are significantly different between patients and controls and between the different diagnostic groups. However, in our cohort, current echocardiographic mTFC are not met by the majority of adolescent ARVC patients, particularly when indexed to body surface area. Measurement of RV apical dimensions and strain may increase the diagnostic yield of echocardiography for ARVC.
AB - BACKGROUND: The usefulness of echocardiographic indices, including those already used by modified Task Force Criteria (mTFC), and others such as strain imaging, to identify arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in adolescence is not well established. METHODS: Echocardiograms from 120 adolescents investigated for ARVC (13±4 years) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the mTFC, patients were classified into definite (n=38), borderline (n=39), or possible (n=43) ARVC. Results were compared with 35 healthy controls. mTFC echocardiographic parameters were analyzed, as well as comprehensive right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular assessment of function including parameters not included in mTFC such as pulsed-wave tissue Doppler and RV 2-dimensional speckle strain. RESULTS: mTFC parameters indexed for body surface area were significantly more abnormal in patients with possible, borderline, or definite ARVC compared with controls for parasternal long-axis view of the RV outflow tract. RV end-diastolic diameters were significantly larger in patients versus controls, a difference that increased with likelihood of ARVC. Left ventricular ejection fraction, tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion, and systolic and diastolic pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging indices were similar to controls for all groups. Average and segmental RV peak longitudinal systolic strain was significantly lower in patients with definite ARVC (−21±4%) and disease subgroups versus controls (−25±3%). Multivariable risk analysis showed that reduced RV strain was significantly associated with ARVC diagnosis and its likelihood (multivariable odds ratio [95% CI]=1.23 [1.1–1.37]; P<0.001) as was increased end-diastolic diameter at the apical third of the RV (multivariable odds ratio [95% CI]=1.51 [1.33–1.72]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: mTFC echocardiographic criteria are significantly different between patients and controls and between the different diagnostic groups. However, in our cohort, current echocardiographic mTFC are not met by the majority of adolescent ARVC patients, particularly when indexed to body surface area. Measurement of RV apical dimensions and strain may increase the diagnostic yield of echocardiography for ARVC.
KW - Adolescents
KW - Cardiomyopathy
KW - Diastole
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Systole
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065038513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065038513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007693
DO - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007693
M3 - Article
C2 - 31002275
AN - SCOPUS:85065038513
SN - 1941-9651
VL - 12
JO - Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
JF - Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging
IS - 4
M1 - e007693
ER -