Autism and the use of fillers: Differences between ‘um’ and ‘uh’

Rebecca Lunsford, Peter A. Heeman, Lois Black, Jan Van Santen

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Little research has been done to explore differences in the use of the fillers ‘um’ and ‘uh’ between children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and those with typical development (TD). Quantifying any differences could aid in diagnosing ASD, understanding its nature, and better understanding the mechanisms involved in dialogue processing. In this paper, we report on a study of dialogues between clinicians and children with ASD or TD, finding that the two groups of children differ substantially in their use of ‘um’ but not ‘uh’. This suggests that these two fillers result from different cognitive processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages107-110
Number of pages4
StatePublished - 2010
Event5th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, DiSS 2010 and the 2nd International Symposium on Linguistic Patterns in Spontaneous Speech, LPSS 2010 - Tokyo, Japan
Duration: Sep 25 2010Sep 26 2010

Conference

Conference5th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, DiSS 2010 and the 2nd International Symposium on Linguistic Patterns in Spontaneous Speech, LPSS 2010
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityTokyo
Period9/25/109/26/10

Keywords

  • autism
  • disfluencies
  • fillers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autism and the use of fillers: Differences between ‘um’ and ‘uh’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this