TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief Report
T2 - Physicians' initial management of acute low back pain versus evidence-based guidelines. Influence of sciatica
AU - Webster, Barbara S.
AU - Courtney, Theodore K.
AU - Huang, Yueng Hsiang
AU - Matz, Simon
AU - Christiani, David C.
PY - 2005/12
Y1 - 2005/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.
AB - BACKGROUND: Little information is available on physician characteristics and patient presentations that may influence compliance with evidence-based guidelines for acute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether physicians' management decisions are consistent with the Agency for Health Research Quality's guideline and whether responses varied with the presentation of sciatica or by physician characteristics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were randomly selected from internal medicine, family practice, general practice, emergency medicine, and occupational medicine specialties. Measurements: A questionnaire asked for recommendations for 2 case scenarios, representing patients without and with sciatica, respectively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty surveys were completed (response rate =25%). In cases 1 (without sciatica) and 2 (with sciatica), 26.9% and 4.3% of physicians fully complied with the guideline, respectively. For each year in practice, the odds of guideline noncompliance increased 1.03 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.05) for case 1. With occupational medicine as the referent specialty, general practice had the greatest odds of noncompliance (3.60, 95% CI = 1.75 to 7.40) in case 1, followed by internal medicine and emergency medicine. Results for case 2 reflected the influence of sciatica with internal medicine having substantially higher odds (vs case 1) and the greatest odds of noncompliance of any specialty (6.93, 95% CI = 1.47 to 32.78), followed by family practice and emergency medicine. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of primary care physicians continue to be noncompliant with evidence-based back pain guidelines. Sciatica dramatically influenced clinical decision-making, increasing the extent of noncompliance, particularly for internal medicine and family practice. Physicians' misunderstanding of sciatica's natural history and belief that more intensive initial management is indicated may be factors underlying the observed influence of sciatica.
KW - Back pain
KW - Clinical vignette
KW - Decision making
KW - Guidelines
KW - Practice variation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30944460281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30944460281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0230.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16423103
AN - SCOPUS:30944460281
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 20
SP - 1132
EP - 1135
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 12
ER -