TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound to Predict Care Escalation in Early Sepsis
T2 - A Pilot Study
AU - Kuttab, Hani I.
AU - Damewood, Sara C.
AU - Schmidt, Jessica
AU - Lin, Amber
AU - Emmerich, Kevin
AU - Schnittke, Nikolai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background: It is challenging to identify emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis who will require resources such as positive-pressure ventilation, vasopressors, or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Objectives: Describe the correlation of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) with need for care escalation. Methods: Single center, prospective, observational study of adult patients with suspected sepsis. CPUS assessed left ventricular systolic function (LVF), right ventricular (RV) size and function, inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility, and thoracic B lines. The primary composite outcome was need for care escalation within 12 hours of ED presentation defined as: ICU admission or positive-pressure ventilation or vasopressor infusion. Results: A total of 92 patients were enrolled; 18 (19.6%) required care escalation. A logistic regression model identified the presence of ≥4 thoracic B-lines as a statistically significant predictor of care escalation (OR 7.8, 95% CI [1.3–26.4], p = 0.002). Other features positively correlated with care escalation were: reduced LVF (OR 4.26, 95% CI [0.06–12.9], p = 0.14), and dilated RV size (OR 2.8, 95% CI [0.4–11.8], p = 0.16). A retrospective stepwise regression model incorporating these three variables to predict care escalation showed an AUROC = 0.75 (95% CI [0.63–0.88]). When 2 or more variables were abnormal the model showed excellent specificity of 95% (LR+ 6.2), but low sensitivity of 33% (LR- 0.7). Conclusions: In patients with concern for sepsis early findings of ≥4 B-lines is associated with care escalation. Combining this finding with LVF and RV size assessment improves the positive predictive power and may be useful in rapid identification of patients likely to require care escalation.
AB - Background: It is challenging to identify emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis who will require resources such as positive-pressure ventilation, vasopressors, or intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Objectives: Describe the correlation of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) with need for care escalation. Methods: Single center, prospective, observational study of adult patients with suspected sepsis. CPUS assessed left ventricular systolic function (LVF), right ventricular (RV) size and function, inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility, and thoracic B lines. The primary composite outcome was need for care escalation within 12 hours of ED presentation defined as: ICU admission or positive-pressure ventilation or vasopressor infusion. Results: A total of 92 patients were enrolled; 18 (19.6%) required care escalation. A logistic regression model identified the presence of ≥4 thoracic B-lines as a statistically significant predictor of care escalation (OR 7.8, 95% CI [1.3–26.4], p = 0.002). Other features positively correlated with care escalation were: reduced LVF (OR 4.26, 95% CI [0.06–12.9], p = 0.14), and dilated RV size (OR 2.8, 95% CI [0.4–11.8], p = 0.16). A retrospective stepwise regression model incorporating these three variables to predict care escalation showed an AUROC = 0.75 (95% CI [0.63–0.88]). When 2 or more variables were abnormal the model showed excellent specificity of 95% (LR+ 6.2), but low sensitivity of 33% (LR- 0.7). Conclusions: In patients with concern for sepsis early findings of ≥4 B-lines is associated with care escalation. Combining this finding with LVF and RV size assessment improves the positive predictive power and may be useful in rapid identification of patients likely to require care escalation.
KW - cardiology
KW - cardiopulmonary ultrasound
KW - point-of-care systems
KW - resource prediction
KW - resuscitation
KW - sepsis
KW - ultrasonography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211091663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85211091663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 39638655
AN - SCOPUS:85211091663
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 68
SP - 54
EP - 65
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
ER -