Communication prior to antiretroviral initiation: Comparing clinician–patient dialogue to guideline recommendations

Wynne Callon, Somnath Saha, Ira B. Wilson, Michael Barton Laws, Michele Massa, P. Todd Korthuis, Richard D. Moore, Mary Catherine Beach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Thoughtful, high-quality clinician–patient communication about starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a cornerstone of HIV care, and specific guidelines regarding exactly what ought to be discussed with patients considering ART have been in place since 2006. The extent to which the recommended topics are discussed and how these topics are addressed in observed dialogue in HIV care has not been studied. We conducted a content analysis to describe how these dialogues occur and, secondarily, assessed the frequency with which the recommended topics are discussed. Our study analyzed patient–clinician dialogue regarding ART initiation, comparing the content of 24 audio-recorded dialogues with the recommended guidelines, and describing how communication about the recommended topics takes place. While patient readiness to initiate therapy was discussed in the majority of visits (n = 18), the remaining topics (e.g. patient understanding of HIV and its treatment, motivation to adhere, barriers to and facilitators of adherence, social support, daily schedules, tolerance of pills) were discussed less often. Based on the findings, we suggest that systems be put in place (e.g. checklists) to guide providers in these discussions, and that providers utilize the teach-back method to ensure patient understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCommunication and Medicine
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • HIV
  • antiretroviral therapy
  • clinician–patient communication
  • medication initiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communication prior to antiretroviral initiation: Comparing clinician–patient dialogue to guideline recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this