Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine

Vaishali V. Phalke, Sachin Gujar, Douglas J. Quint

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations


3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-248
Number of pages8
JournalNeuroimaging Clinics of North America
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the Spine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this