Comparison of cell-permeable calpain inhibitors and E64 in reduction of cataract in cultured rat lenses

K. J. Lampi, K. Kadoya, M. Azuma, L. L. David, T. R. Shearer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

E64, an inhibitor of calpain (EC 3.4.22.17) and other cysteine proteases, slows the rate of formation of cataract in cultured rat lenses. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) why E64, a charged compound with little cell permeability, was effective in reducing cataract in cultured lens and (2) whether uncharged more permeable protease inhibitors are more effective than E64 in preventing cataract. Results showed that E64 entered the lens, but only after the lens was treated with the calcium ionophore, A23187, or sodium selenite, both of which cause cataracts. Therefore, the uptake and subsequent effectiveness of E64 may be related to a generalized increase in membrane permeability during induction of cataract in culture. Three protease inhibitors, reported to have improved cell permeability, were compared with E64 for their ability to prevent cataracts in cultured lenses. cBz-ValPheH, calpain inhibitors I and II, are uncharged-aldehyde inhibitors of calpain. Calpain inhibitors I and II even at high concentrations were not effective at reducing lens opacity caused by calcium ionophore and were toxic to the lens. cBz-ValPheH, which is slightly toxic to the lens, was able to significantly reduce lens opacity induced by calcium ionophore. The presented data suggest that while E64 decreases cataract formation in cultured lens, the more cell permeable inhibitor, cBz-ValPheH, may have greater efficacy as an anticataract drug in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-57
Number of pages5
JournalToxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of cell-permeable calpain inhibitors and E64 in reduction of cataract in cultured rat lenses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this