Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching

James A. Henry, Christopher L. Flick, Alison Gilbert, Roger M. Ellingson, Stephen A. Fausti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations


Clinical assessment of the perceptual characteristics of tinnitus usually includes an attempt to match the pitch of tinnitus to a pure tone. A standardized clinical protocol for tinnitus pitch matching does not yet exist, and there is a history of unsuccessful attempts to obtain such measures reliably. The present study was designed to evaluate new protocols for identifying the perceived pitch of tinnitus, with the objectives of reducing testing time and improving test-retest reliability. Two protocols ("Octave" and "Binary") were developed, each of which was patterned after the testing procedure previously developed at the Oregon Tinnitus Clinic and used to assess thousands of tinnitus patients. Both protocols use computer-automation to conduct testing; the protocols differ according to their specific testing algorithms. Twenty subjects with nonfluctuating tinnitus were each tested over two sessions. Results of testing revealed that both protocols could obtain pitch matches within 20 to 25 min. Reliability of responses was good for some subjects but not others, and the Binary protocol generally provided more reliable results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-566
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001


  • Hearing disorders
  • Pitch perception
  • Reliability of results
  • Tinnitus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this