TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Prevention of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
T2 - A Delphi Consensus Statement
AU - Massey, Paul R.
AU - Schmults, Chrysalyne D.
AU - Li, Sara J.
AU - Arron, Sarah T.
AU - Asgari, Maryam M.
AU - Bouwes Bavinck, Jan Nico
AU - Billingsley, Elizabeth
AU - Blalock, Travis W.
AU - Blasdale, Katie
AU - Carroll, Bryan T.
AU - Carucci, John A.
AU - Chong, Alvin H.
AU - Christensen, Sean R.
AU - Chung, Christina Lee
AU - Desimone, Jennifer A.
AU - Ducroux, Emilie
AU - Escutia-Muñoz, Begoña
AU - Ferrándiz-Pulido, Carla
AU - Fox, Matthew C.
AU - Genders, Roel E.
AU - Geusau, Alexandra
AU - Gjersvik, Petter
AU - Hanlon, Allison M.
AU - Olasz Harken, Edit B.
AU - Hofbauer, Günther F.L.
AU - Hopkins, R. Samuel
AU - Leitenberger, Justin J.
AU - Loss, Manisha J.
AU - Del Marmol, Veronique
AU - Mascaró, José M.
AU - Myers, Sarah A.
AU - Nguyen, Bichchau T.
AU - Oliveira, Walmar R.P.
AU - Otley, Clark C.
AU - Proby, Charlotte M.
AU - Rácz, Emőke
AU - Ruiz-Salas, Veronica
AU - Samie, Faramarz H.
AU - Seçkin, Deniz
AU - Shah, Syed N.
AU - Shin, Thuzar M.
AU - Shumack, Stephen P.
AU - Soon, Seaver L.
AU - Stasko, Thomas
AU - Zavattaro, Elisa
AU - Zeitouni, Nathalie C.
AU - Zwald, Fiona O.Reilly
AU - Harwood, Catherine A.
AU - Jambusaria-Pahlajani, Anokhi
N1 - Funding Information:
reported serving as a steering committee member for Castle Biosciences, a steering committee member and consultant for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and a consultant for Sanofi; receiving research funding from Castle Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Genentech, and Merck; and serving a chair for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Dr Arron reported being an employee of Rakuten Medical and serving as a consultant for Castle Biosciences and EnSpectra Health. Dr Asgari reported receiving grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Christensen reported receiving grants from PellePharm and serving as a consultant for the Regeneron/Sanofi Advisory Board and LEO Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr DeSimone reported serving as a consultant and receiving speaker fees from Sanofi/Genzyme outside the submitted work. Dr Ferrándiz-Pulido reported receiving advisory fees from Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Almirall, and Galderma outside the submitted work. Dr Shin reported receiving grants from Regeneron outside the submitted work. Dr Zeitouni reported receiving grants from Biofrontera, consulting and speaker fees from Biofrontera, grants and consultant from Sun Pharma, and speaker fees from Genentech and Sanofi/Regeneron outside the submitted work. Dr Harwood reported receiving personal fees from LEO Pharma, Sanofi/Regeneron, Merck, Novartis, and PellePharm and nonfinancial support from Meda and PellePharm trial outside the submitted work and grants from the UK National Institute for Health Research. Dr Jambusaria-Pahlajani reported receiving an unrestricted educational grant from Regeneron outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Importance: There is a paucity of evidence to guide physicians regarding prevention strategies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Objective: To examine the development and results of a Delphi process initiated to identify consensus-based medical management recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. Evidence Review: Dermatologists with more than 5 years' experience treating SOTRs were invited to participate. A novel actinic damage and skin cancer index (AD-SCI), consisting of 6 ordinal stages corresponding to an increasing burden of actinic damage and CSCC, was used to guide survey design. Three sequential web-based surveys were administered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Pursuant to Delphi principles, respondents thoroughly reviewed all peer responses between rounds. Supplemental questions were also asked to better understand panelists' rationale for their responses. Findings: The Delphi panel comprised 48 dermatologists. Respondents represented 13 countries, with 27 (56%) from the US. Twenty-nine respondents (60%) were Mohs surgeons. Consensus was reached with 80% or higher concordance among respondents when presented with a statement, question, or management strategy pertaining to prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. A near-consensus category of 70% to less than 80% concordance was also defined. The AD-SCI stage-based recommendations were established if consensus or near-consensus was achieved. The panel was able to make recommendations for 5 of 6 AD-SCI stages. Key recommendations include the following: cryotherapy for scattered actinic keratosis (AK); field therapy for AK when grouped in 1 anatomical area, unless AKs are thick in which case field therapy and cryotherapy were recommended; combination lesion directed and field therapy with fluorouracil for field cancerized skin; and initiation of acitretin therapy and discussion of immunosuppression reduction or modification for patients who develop multiple skin cancers at a high rate (10 CSCCs per year) or develop high-risk CSCC (defined by a tumor with approximately ≥20% risk of nodal metastasis). No consensus recommendation was achieved for SOTRs with a first low risk CSCC. Conclusions and Relevance: Physicians may consider implementation of panel recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs while awaiting high-level-of-evidence data. Additional clinical trials are needed in areas where consensus was not reached..
AB - Importance: There is a paucity of evidence to guide physicians regarding prevention strategies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Objective: To examine the development and results of a Delphi process initiated to identify consensus-based medical management recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. Evidence Review: Dermatologists with more than 5 years' experience treating SOTRs were invited to participate. A novel actinic damage and skin cancer index (AD-SCI), consisting of 6 ordinal stages corresponding to an increasing burden of actinic damage and CSCC, was used to guide survey design. Three sequential web-based surveys were administered from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Pursuant to Delphi principles, respondents thoroughly reviewed all peer responses between rounds. Supplemental questions were also asked to better understand panelists' rationale for their responses. Findings: The Delphi panel comprised 48 dermatologists. Respondents represented 13 countries, with 27 (56%) from the US. Twenty-nine respondents (60%) were Mohs surgeons. Consensus was reached with 80% or higher concordance among respondents when presented with a statement, question, or management strategy pertaining to prevention of CSCC in SOTRs. A near-consensus category of 70% to less than 80% concordance was also defined. The AD-SCI stage-based recommendations were established if consensus or near-consensus was achieved. The panel was able to make recommendations for 5 of 6 AD-SCI stages. Key recommendations include the following: cryotherapy for scattered actinic keratosis (AK); field therapy for AK when grouped in 1 anatomical area, unless AKs are thick in which case field therapy and cryotherapy were recommended; combination lesion directed and field therapy with fluorouracil for field cancerized skin; and initiation of acitretin therapy and discussion of immunosuppression reduction or modification for patients who develop multiple skin cancers at a high rate (10 CSCCs per year) or develop high-risk CSCC (defined by a tumor with approximately ≥20% risk of nodal metastasis). No consensus recommendation was achieved for SOTRs with a first low risk CSCC. Conclusions and Relevance: Physicians may consider implementation of panel recommendations for prevention of CSCC in SOTRs while awaiting high-level-of-evidence data. Additional clinical trials are needed in areas where consensus was not reached..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114417518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114417518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3180
DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3180
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34468690
AN - SCOPUS:85114417518
SN - 2168-6068
VL - 157
SP - 1219
EP - 1226
JO - JAMA Dermatology
JF - JAMA Dermatology
IS - 10
ER -