TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Recommendations for Disease-and Treatment-Related Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer
T2 - A Modified Delphi Panel
AU - Freedland, Stephen J.
AU - Aronson, William
AU - Asher, Arash
AU - Golant, Mitch
AU - Lemke, Emily
AU - Morgans, Alicia K.
AU - Morris, David
AU - Sullivan, Carol
AU - Sutton, Jennifer
AU - Thomson, Cynthia A.
AU - Twardowski, Przemyslaw
AU - Wefel, Jeffrey S.
AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri
AU - Chakoian, Marty
AU - Wells, Ted
AU - Elsouda, Dina
AU - Turnbull, James
AU - Buzaglo, Joanne
AU - Mobley, Claire
AU - Ivanova, Jasmina
AU - Cohen, Jason
AU - Hogue, Susan
AU - El-Chaar, Nader
AU - Touya, Maelys
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026, Harborside Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/5/1
Y1 - 2026/5/1
N2 - Background: Among patients with advanced prostate cancer (aPC), fatigue is a commonly experienced symptom that may be associated with the disease itself or occur as a side effect of treatment. We aimed to develop evidence-based, consensus-driven statements to support shared decision-making for managing fatigue in patients with aPC. Methods: To identify potential fatigue-management strategies, we performed a targeted literature review followed by expert advisor interviews, and then conducted a modified Delphi panel. In both the interviews and the modified Delphi panel, participants included oncologists, urologists, exercise scientists, psychologists, nutritionists/ dietitians, and nurse practitioners/nurses. The modified Delphi panel comprised 2 survey rounds, with a live panel discussion between them, intended to drive consensus on the statements. In determining consensus for the final statements, each strategy’s effectiveness, accessibility for patients, and feasibility for both patients and health care providers were taken into account. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement or disagreement with each statement. Results: The targeted literature review identified 14 fatigue-management strategies derived from 32 articles. These strategies were further refined and expanded by the expert advisors and modified Delphi panelists, who ultimately compiled a final list of 15 statements, each achieving ≥75% agreement. The 15 statements were grouped into 4 categories of fatigue-management strategies: exercise (eg, endurance, strength, aerobic, and resistance training), diet and nutrition (eg, hydration and healthy eating), clinical management (eg, counseling and support groups), and “other strategies” (eg, acupuncture and adopting good sleep habits). Conclusions: These recommendations and considerations provide practical guidance—grounded in evidence and expert opinion—for managing fatigue in patients with aPC, with the goal of improving quality of life. Future research should prioritize highquality studies evaluating fatigue-management strategies in aPC, particularly in areas where published evidence remains limited.
AB - Background: Among patients with advanced prostate cancer (aPC), fatigue is a commonly experienced symptom that may be associated with the disease itself or occur as a side effect of treatment. We aimed to develop evidence-based, consensus-driven statements to support shared decision-making for managing fatigue in patients with aPC. Methods: To identify potential fatigue-management strategies, we performed a targeted literature review followed by expert advisor interviews, and then conducted a modified Delphi panel. In both the interviews and the modified Delphi panel, participants included oncologists, urologists, exercise scientists, psychologists, nutritionists/ dietitians, and nurse practitioners/nurses. The modified Delphi panel comprised 2 survey rounds, with a live panel discussion between them, intended to drive consensus on the statements. In determining consensus for the final statements, each strategy’s effectiveness, accessibility for patients, and feasibility for both patients and health care providers were taken into account. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement or disagreement with each statement. Results: The targeted literature review identified 14 fatigue-management strategies derived from 32 articles. These strategies were further refined and expanded by the expert advisors and modified Delphi panelists, who ultimately compiled a final list of 15 statements, each achieving ≥75% agreement. The 15 statements were grouped into 4 categories of fatigue-management strategies: exercise (eg, endurance, strength, aerobic, and resistance training), diet and nutrition (eg, hydration and healthy eating), clinical management (eg, counseling and support groups), and “other strategies” (eg, acupuncture and adopting good sleep habits). Conclusions: These recommendations and considerations provide practical guidance—grounded in evidence and expert opinion—for managing fatigue in patients with aPC, with the goal of improving quality of life. Future research should prioritize highquality studies evaluating fatigue-management strategies in aPC, particularly in areas where published evidence remains limited.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039267599
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105039267599#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2025.7140
DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2025.7140
M3 - Article
C2 - 41921711
AN - SCOPUS:105039267599
SN - 1540-1405
VL - 24
JO - JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
JF - JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
IS - 5
M1 - e257140
ER -