TY - JOUR
T1 - DCE-MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - perfusion quantification with Tofts model versus shutter-speed model—initial experience
AU - Jajamovich, Guido H.
AU - Huang, Wei
AU - Besa, Cecilia
AU - Li, Xin
AU - Afzal, Aneela
AU - Dyvorne, Hadrien A.
AU - Taouli, Bachir
N1 - Funding Information:
This HIPAA compliant prospective study was funded by the National Cancer Institute (Grant Numbers U01 CA172320 and U01 CA154602), and approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Program for the Protection of Human Subjects. Written consent was obtained from all patients prior to the exam. The study included 25 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease and HCC that underwent a DCE-MRI exam at Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients were enrolled from June 2013 to June 2014. Liver diseases were related to the following etiologies: chronic hepatitis C (n = 18), chronic hepatitis B (n = 5), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (n = 1), and unknown cause (n = 1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, ESMRMB.
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Objective: To quantify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) perfusion and flow with the fast exchange regime-allowed Shutter-Speed model (SSM) compared to the Tofts model (TM). Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 25 patients with HCC underwent DCE-MRI. ROIs were placed in liver parenchyma, portal vein, aorta and HCC lesions. Signal intensities were analyzed employing dual-input TM and SSM models. ART (arterial fraction), Ktrans (contrast agent transfer rate constant from plasma to extravascular extracellular space), ve (extravascular extracellular volume fraction), kep (contrast agent intravasation rate constant), and τi (mean intracellular water molecule lifetime) were compared between liver parenchyma and HCC, and ART, Ktrans, ve and kep were compared between models using Wilcoxon tests and limits of agreement. Test–retest reproducibility was assessed in 10 patients. Results: ART and ve obtained with TM; ART, ve, ke and τi obtained with SSM were significantly different between liver parenchyma and HCC (p < 0.04). Parameters showed variable reproducibility (CV range 14.7–66.5 % for both models). Liver Ktrans and ve; HCC ve and kep were significantly different when estimated with the two models (p < 0.03). Conclusion: Our results show differences when computed between the TM and the SSM. However, these differences are smaller than parameter reproducibilities and may be of limited clinical significance.
AB - Objective: To quantify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) perfusion and flow with the fast exchange regime-allowed Shutter-Speed model (SSM) compared to the Tofts model (TM). Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 25 patients with HCC underwent DCE-MRI. ROIs were placed in liver parenchyma, portal vein, aorta and HCC lesions. Signal intensities were analyzed employing dual-input TM and SSM models. ART (arterial fraction), Ktrans (contrast agent transfer rate constant from plasma to extravascular extracellular space), ve (extravascular extracellular volume fraction), kep (contrast agent intravasation rate constant), and τi (mean intracellular water molecule lifetime) were compared between liver parenchyma and HCC, and ART, Ktrans, ve and kep were compared between models using Wilcoxon tests and limits of agreement. Test–retest reproducibility was assessed in 10 patients. Results: ART and ve obtained with TM; ART, ve, ke and τi obtained with SSM were significantly different between liver parenchyma and HCC (p < 0.04). Parameters showed variable reproducibility (CV range 14.7–66.5 % for both models). Liver Ktrans and ve; HCC ve and kep were significantly different when estimated with the two models (p < 0.03). Conclusion: Our results show differences when computed between the TM and the SSM. However, these differences are smaller than parameter reproducibilities and may be of limited clinical significance.
KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - Liver
KW - MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957958746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957958746&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10334-015-0513-4
DO - 10.1007/s10334-015-0513-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 26646522
AN - SCOPUS:84957958746
SN - 0968-5243
VL - 29
SP - 49
EP - 58
JO - Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
IS - 1
ER -