TY - JOUR
T1 - Distal Radius Interventions for Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) trial
T2 - study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial of completely translated distal radius fractures at paediatric hospitals in North America
AU - IMPACCT Consortium
AU - Bonner, Lauren Balmert
AU - Janicki, Joseph
AU - Georgiadis, Andrew
AU - Truong, Walter
AU - Beauvais, Dorothy Harris
AU - Belthur, Mohan
AU - Daley, Erika L.
AU - Franzone, Jeanne
AU - Howard, Andrew
AU - May, Collin
AU - Rockhold, Frank
AU - Schulz, Jacob
AU - Bailey, Mary
AU - Chiswell, Karen
AU - DeLaRosa, Jesse
AU - Brooks, Jaysson T.
AU - Cantanzano, Anthony A.
AU - Chan, Andrea
AU - Chu, Alice
AU - Dodwell, Emily R.
AU - El-Hawary, Ron
AU - Ellis, Henry
AU - Fitzgerald, Ryan
AU - Frick, Steven
AU - Ganley, Theodore J.
AU - Gargiulo, Dominic
AU - Gauthier, Luke
AU - Gill, Corey S.
AU - Goldstein, Rachel
AU - Halsey, Matthew F.
AU - Hardesty, Christina
AU - Ho, Christine
AU - Kaushal, Neil
AU - Lawrence, John Todd
AU - Lee, R. Jay
AU - Leitch, Khristinn K.
AU - Masrouha, Karim
AU - Mitchell, Stuart
AU - OMalley, Natasha
AU - Payares-Lizano, Monica
AU - Perry, Daniel
AU - Ramalingam, Wendy
AU - Rhodes, Jason
AU - Sanders, Julia
AU - Shah, Apurva S.
AU - Sharkey, Melinda
AU - Silva, Mauricio
AU - Silva, Selina
AU - Thompson, Rachael
AU - Vorhies, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.
PY - 2025/10/29
Y1 - 2025/10/29
N2 - Introduction Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation. Methods and analysis Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations).
AB - Introduction Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation. Methods and analysis Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations).
KW - Clinical Trial
KW - ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY
KW - Paediatric orthopaedics
KW - Randomized Controlled Trial
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020481121
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020481121#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088273
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088273
M3 - Article
C2 - 41161832
AN - SCOPUS:105020481121
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 15
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 10
M1 - e088273
ER -