Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era

  • Michael E. Roth
  • , Joseph M. Unger
  • , Ann M. O'Mara
  • , Mark A. Lewis
  • , Troy Budd
  • , Rebecca H. Johnson
  • , Brad H. Pollock
  • , Charles Blanke
  • , David R. Freyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Few adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years old) enroll onto cancer clinical trials, which hinders research otherwise having the potential to improve outcomes in this unique population. Prior studies have reported that AYAs are more likely to receive cancer care in community settings. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has led efforts to increase trial enrollment through its network of NCI-designated cancer centers (NCICC) combined with community outreach through its Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP; replaced by the NCI Community Oncology Research Program in 2014). Methods: Using AYA proportional enrollment (the proportion of total enrollments who were AYAs) as the primary outcome, we examined enrollment of AYAs onto SWOG therapeutic trials at NCICC, CCOP, and non-NCICC/non-CCOP sites from 2004 to 2013 by type of site, study period (2004-08 vs 2009-13), and patient demographics. Results: Overall, AYA proportional enrollment was 10.1%. AYA proportional enrollment decreased between 2004-2008 and 2009-2013 (13.1% vs 8.5%, P <.001), and was higher at NCICCs than at CCOPs and non-NCICC/non-CCOPs (14.1% vs 8.3% and 9.2%, respectively; P <.001). AYA proportional enrollment declined significantly at all three site types. Proportional enrollment of AYAs who were Black or Hispanic was significantly higher at NCICCs compared with CCOPs or non-NCICC/non-CCOPs (11.5% vs 8.8, P =.048 and 11.5% vs 8.6%, P =.03, respectively). Conclusion: Not only did community sites enroll a lower proportion of AYAs onto cancer clinical trials, but AYA enrollment decreased in all study settings. Initiatives aimed at increasing AYA enrollment, particularly in the community setting with attention to minority status, are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2146-2152
Number of pages7
JournalCancer medicine
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

Funding

This work was supported by grants U10-CA180886 (MR, DRF), UG1-CA189955 (BP), P30-CA093373 (BP) and U10CA180888 (CB), U10CA180819 (JU), UG1CA189805 (RJ, ML) from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. The Aflac Foundation also provided partial support (MR, DRF). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work was supported by grants U10‐CA180886 (MR, DRF), UG1‐CA189955 (BP), P30‐CA093373 (BP) and U10CA180888 (CB), U10CA180819 (JU), UG1CA189805 (RJ, ML) from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. The Aflac Foundation also provided partial support (MR, DRF). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

FundersFunder number
Author National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health The Bev Hartig Huntington's Disease Foundation National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Health-National Cancer InstituteUG1CA189805, P30CA093373, U10CA180819, U10CA180888
AFLAC
BPP30‐CA093373

    Keywords

    • CCOP
    • NCI
    • NCORP
    • SWOG
    • adolescent and young adult
    • cancer
    • clinical trials
    • enrollment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
    • Cancer Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this