TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining pediatric resuscitation education using simulation and scripted debriefing
T2 - A multicenter randomized trial
AU - Cheng, Adam
AU - Hunt, Elizabeth A.
AU - Donoghue, Aaron
AU - Nelson-McMillan, Kristen
AU - Nishisaki, Akira
AU - LeFlore, Judy
AU - Eppich, Walter
AU - Moyer, Mike
AU - Brett-Fleegler, Marisa
AU - Kleinman, Monica
AU - Anderson, Jo Dee
AU - Adler, Mark
AU - Braga, Matthew
AU - Kost, Susanne
AU - Stryjewski, Glenn
AU - Min, Steve
AU - Podraza, John
AU - Lopreiato, Joseph
AU - Hamilton, Melinda Fiedor
AU - Stone, Kimberly
AU - Reid, Jennifer
AU - Hopkins, Jeffrey
AU - Manos, Jennifer
AU - Duff, Jonathan
AU - Richard, Matthew
AU - Nadkarni, Vinay M.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Importance: Resuscitation training programs use simulation and debriefing as an educational modality with limited standardization of debriefing format and content. Our study attempted to address this issue by using a debriefing script to standardize debriefings. Objective: To determine whether use of a scripted debriefing by novice instructors and/or simulator physical realism affects knowledge and performance in simulated cardiopulmonary arrests. Design: Prospective, randomized, factorial study design. Setting: The study was conducted from 2008 to 2011 at 14 Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing (EXPRESS) network simulation programs. Interprofessional health care teams participated in 2 simulated cardiopulmonary arrests, before and after debriefing. Participants: Werandomized 97 participants (23 teams) to nonscripted low-realism; 93 participants (22 teams) to scripted low-realism; 103 participants (23 teams) to nonscripted high-realism; and 94 participants (22 teams) to scripted high-realism groups. Intervention: Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: permutations of scripted vs nonscripted debriefing and high-realism vs low-realism simulators. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage difference (0%-100%) in multiple choice question (MCQ) test (individual scores), Behavioral Assessment Tool (BAT) (team leader performance), and the Clinical Performance Tool (CPT) (team performance) scores postintervention vs preintervention comparison (PPC). Results: There was no significant difference at baseline in nonscripted vs scripted groups for MCQ(P =.87), BAT (P =.99), and CPT (P =.95) scores. Scripted debriefing showed greater improvement in knowledge (mean [95% CI] MCQ-PPC, 5.3% [4.1%-6.5%] vs 3.6% [2.3%-4.7%]; P =.04) and team leader behavioral performance (median [interquartile range (IQR)] BAT-PPC, 16% [7.4%-28.5%] vs 8% [0.2%-31.6%]; P =.03). Their improvement in clinical performance during simulated cardio-pulmonary arrests was not significantly different (median [IQR] CPT-PPC, 7.9% [4.8%-15.1%] vs 6.7% [2.8%-12.7%], P =.18). Level of physical realism of the simulator had no independent effect on these outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of a standardized script by novice instructors to facilitate team debriefings improves acquisition of knowledge and team leader behavioral performance during subsequent simulated cardiopulmonary arrests. Implementation of debriefing scripts in resuscitation courses may help to improve learning outcomes and standardize delivery of debriefing, particularly for novice instructors.
AB - Importance: Resuscitation training programs use simulation and debriefing as an educational modality with limited standardization of debriefing format and content. Our study attempted to address this issue by using a debriefing script to standardize debriefings. Objective: To determine whether use of a scripted debriefing by novice instructors and/or simulator physical realism affects knowledge and performance in simulated cardiopulmonary arrests. Design: Prospective, randomized, factorial study design. Setting: The study was conducted from 2008 to 2011 at 14 Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing (EXPRESS) network simulation programs. Interprofessional health care teams participated in 2 simulated cardiopulmonary arrests, before and after debriefing. Participants: Werandomized 97 participants (23 teams) to nonscripted low-realism; 93 participants (22 teams) to scripted low-realism; 103 participants (23 teams) to nonscripted high-realism; and 94 participants (22 teams) to scripted high-realism groups. Intervention: Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: permutations of scripted vs nonscripted debriefing and high-realism vs low-realism simulators. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage difference (0%-100%) in multiple choice question (MCQ) test (individual scores), Behavioral Assessment Tool (BAT) (team leader performance), and the Clinical Performance Tool (CPT) (team performance) scores postintervention vs preintervention comparison (PPC). Results: There was no significant difference at baseline in nonscripted vs scripted groups for MCQ(P =.87), BAT (P =.99), and CPT (P =.95) scores. Scripted debriefing showed greater improvement in knowledge (mean [95% CI] MCQ-PPC, 5.3% [4.1%-6.5%] vs 3.6% [2.3%-4.7%]; P =.04) and team leader behavioral performance (median [interquartile range (IQR)] BAT-PPC, 16% [7.4%-28.5%] vs 8% [0.2%-31.6%]; P =.03). Their improvement in clinical performance during simulated cardio-pulmonary arrests was not significantly different (median [IQR] CPT-PPC, 7.9% [4.8%-15.1%] vs 6.7% [2.8%-12.7%], P =.18). Level of physical realism of the simulator had no independent effect on these outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of a standardized script by novice instructors to facilitate team debriefings improves acquisition of knowledge and team leader behavioral performance during subsequent simulated cardiopulmonary arrests. Implementation of debriefing scripts in resuscitation courses may help to improve learning outcomes and standardize delivery of debriefing, particularly for novice instructors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878316269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878316269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1389
DO - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1389
M3 - Article
C2 - 23608924
AN - SCOPUS:84878316269
SN - 2168-6203
VL - 167
SP - 528
EP - 536
JO - A.M.A. American journal of diseases of children
JF - A.M.A. American journal of diseases of children
IS - 6
ER -