TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiential Learning Through Participatory Action Research in Public Health Supports Community-Based Training of Future Health Professionals
AU - Marriott, Lisa K.
AU - Lipus, Adam C.
AU - Choate, Laurie
AU - Smith, Jamie
AU - Coppola, Leigh
AU - Cameron, William E.
AU - Shannon, Jackilen
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by two Science Education Partnership Awards (SEPA R25OD010496 to LKM/JS and R25RR20443 to WEC), a Clinical and Translational Service Award (CTSA UL1TR000128 to Eric Orwoll), American Recovery and Reinvestment Act administrative supplements from the National Institutes of Health to both SEPA (3 R25 RR020443 05S1) and CTSA (3 UL1 RR024140 04S3) and parent grants, and a community health education grant from the National Cancer Institute (3P30CA069533-13S9 to B. Druker).
Funding Information:
We wish to thank the generous contributions of our volunteers who have made Let?s Get Healthy! possible. We would also like to thank Rick Deyo, Paige Farris, Paul McGinnis, Joan Randall, Jon Purnell, Wyatt Messenger, Bridget Leineweber, Alysia Cox, Berk Moss, and Arwen Bunce for assistance with the program at OHSU. Thank you to Susan Bankowski and Wendy Doggett of the OHSU IRB for their attentive guidance and helpful comments during the process of incorporating community-based volunteers into the research protocol. We are also grateful to the communities and schools who have held events and helped us to recruit volunteers, including Amanda Wright, Solomon Trimble, and the Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest (Portland, OR); Alison Charbonneau and Joanna Rao (St. Helens, OR); Lisa Rhuman and the OHSU Heart Research Center (Portland, OR); Gloria Harrison and the OHSU Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine (Portland, OR); Beth Ann Beamer (Madras, OR); Kelley Recker, Ronell Warner and the Canby Center (Canby, OR); Juli Gregory and Kathy Thomas (Hermiston, OR); Corliss McKeever and the African American Health Coalition (Portland, OR); Nancy Findholt and Angie Combe (LaGrande, OR); Thayne Balzer (West Linn/Wilsonville, OR); Courtney Ferrari and June Poling (Beaverton, OR); Susan Shugerman, Kathryn Lenahan, and the OHSU Office of Science Education Opportunities (Portland, OR); Patricia Thomas, Nadia Saina, and the University of Kansas Medical Center (Nicodemus, KS); Holden Leung, Christine Lau, Seline La, and the Asian Health & Service Center (Portland, OR). Maureen Munn (Seattle, WA); Michael Hecker (Bend, OR); Alisa Lee, Marlaina Schroeder, and Cristina Buss (Sacramento, CA); Melinda Veliz (Woodburn, OR); and Jackie Murphy and Self-Enhancement, Inc. (Portland, OR). The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by two Science Education Partnership Awards (SEPA R25OD010496 to LKM/JS and R25RR20443 to WEC), a Clinical and Translational Service Award (CTSA UL1TR000128 to Eric Orwoll), American Recovery and Reinvestment Act administrative supplements from the National Institutes of Health to both SEPA (3 R25 RR020443 05S1) and CTSA (3 UL1 RR024140 04S3) and parent grants, and a community health education grant from the National Cancer Institute (3P30CA069533-13S9 to B. Druker).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Society for Public Health Education.
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Engaging community members in research can help cultivate effective partnerships while providing experiential training and continuing education opportunities. Several studies have involved communities in this way, though many have been small in the scale of community involvement or have included little detail of the institutional review board process by which community members became approved researchers in the study. This article presents findings on an evaluation of the training procedures and experiences of 703 first-time community-based volunteer researchers who were recruited in their communities and trained on-site to enroll research participants, collect data, and provide individualized consultation of results at travelling health education and research fairs. Open-ended registration prompts and postfair surveys assessed volunteers’ reasons for participating, comfort with their volunteer experiences, and attitudes toward the biomedical research process. An open-ended survey assessed two key community partners’ perspectives about their organizations’ involvement with supporting the research throughout the process. Volunteers reported their experience to be a unique training opportunity, citing its ability to help them engage with their community, advance research, and obtain additional experience in their health field of interest, particularly nursing, allied health, and medicine-related careers. Community partners cited that their community’s participation as volunteer researchers served as a tool to educate the larger community about research, which enabled other research projects to gain acceptance. Together, these results demonstrate that using volunteer researchers can strengthen community research partnerships while providing valuable training experience in public health research for current and aspiring health personnel.
AB - Engaging community members in research can help cultivate effective partnerships while providing experiential training and continuing education opportunities. Several studies have involved communities in this way, though many have been small in the scale of community involvement or have included little detail of the institutional review board process by which community members became approved researchers in the study. This article presents findings on an evaluation of the training procedures and experiences of 703 first-time community-based volunteer researchers who were recruited in their communities and trained on-site to enroll research participants, collect data, and provide individualized consultation of results at travelling health education and research fairs. Open-ended registration prompts and postfair surveys assessed volunteers’ reasons for participating, comfort with their volunteer experiences, and attitudes toward the biomedical research process. An open-ended survey assessed two key community partners’ perspectives about their organizations’ involvement with supporting the research throughout the process. Volunteers reported their experience to be a unique training opportunity, citing its ability to help them engage with their community, advance research, and obtain additional experience in their health field of interest, particularly nursing, allied health, and medicine-related careers. Community partners cited that their community’s participation as volunteer researchers served as a tool to educate the larger community about research, which enabled other research projects to gain acceptance. Together, these results demonstrate that using volunteer researchers can strengthen community research partnerships while providing valuable training experience in public health research for current and aspiring health personnel.
KW - human subject research
KW - rural
KW - school
KW - volunteer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067880947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067880947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2373379915601119
DO - 10.1177/2373379915601119
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067880947
SN - 2373-3799
VL - 1
SP - 220
EP - 232
JO - Pedagogy in Health Promotion
JF - Pedagogy in Health Promotion
IS - 4
ER -