TY - JOUR
T1 - External Evaluation of Risperidone Population Pharmacokinetic Models Using Opportunistic Pediatric Data
AU - On Behalf of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
AU - Karatza, Eleni
AU - Ganguly, Samit
AU - Hornik, Chi D.
AU - Muller, William J.
AU - Al-Uzri, Amira
AU - James, Laura
AU - Balevic, Stephen J.
AU - Gonzalez, Daniel
N1 - Funding Information:
EK received funding from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) through a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC)/GSK Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Post-Doctoral Fellowship.
Funding Information:
This work was funded under the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) contract (HHSN275201000003I) for the Pediatric Trials Network (PI: Danny Benjamin). EK was funded through a UNC/GSK Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Post-Doctoral Fellowship. DG receives salary support for research from the NICHD (5R01HD096435-03, 1R01HD102949-01A1, and HHSN275201000003I). The content is solely the authors? responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
SG is employed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SJB receives support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Food and Drug Administration, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Scientist Development Award, the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, and consulting for UCB. DG receives research support from Nabriva Therapeutics through a contract with The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In addition, DG serves as a consultant for Tellus Therapeutics, focusing on neonatal drug development.
Funding Information:
This work was funded under the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) contract (HHSN275201000003I) for the Pediatric Trials Network (PI: Danny Benjamin). EK was funded through a UNC/GSK Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Post-Doctoral Fellowship. DG receives salary support for research from the NICHD (5R01HD096435-03, 1R01HD102949-01A1, and HHSN275201000003I). The content is solely the authors’ responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Karatza, Ganguly, Hornik, Muller, Al-Uzri, James, Balevic and Gonzalez.
PY - 2022/3/17
Y1 - 2022/3/17
N2 - Risperidone is approved to treat schizophrenia in adolescents and autistic disorder and bipolar mania in children and adolescents. It is also used off-label in younger children for various psychiatric disorders. Several population pharmacokinetic models of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone have been published. The objectives of this study were to assess whether opportunistically collected pediatric data can be used to evaluate risperidone population pharmacokinetic models externally and to identify a robust model for precision dosing in children. A total of 103 concentrations of risperidone and 112 concentrations of 9-OH-risperidone, collected from 62 pediatric patients (0.16–16.8 years of age), were used in the present study. The predictive performance of five published population pharmacokinetic models (four joint parent-metabolite models and one parent only) was assessed for accuracy and precision of the predictions using statistical criteria, goodness of fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPCs), and normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDEs). The tested models produced similarly precise predictions (Root Mean Square Error [RMSE]) ranging from 0.021 to 0.027 nmol/ml for risperidone and 0.053–0.065 nmol/ml for 9-OH-risperidone). However, one of the models (a one-compartment mixture model with clearance estimated for three subpopulations) developed with a rich dataset presented fewer biases (Mean Percent Error [MPE, %] of 1.0% vs. 101.4, 146.9, 260.4, and 292.4%) for risperidone. In contrast, a model developed with fewer data and a more similar population to the one used for the external evaluation presented fewer biases for 9-OH-risperidone (MPE: 17% vs. 69.9, 47.8, and 82.9%). None of the models evaluated seemed to be generalizable to the population used in this analysis. All the models had a modest predictive performance, potentially suggesting that sources of inter-individual variability were not entirely captured and that opportunistic data from a highly heterogeneous population are likely not the most appropriate data to evaluate risperidone models externally.
AB - Risperidone is approved to treat schizophrenia in adolescents and autistic disorder and bipolar mania in children and adolescents. It is also used off-label in younger children for various psychiatric disorders. Several population pharmacokinetic models of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone have been published. The objectives of this study were to assess whether opportunistically collected pediatric data can be used to evaluate risperidone population pharmacokinetic models externally and to identify a robust model for precision dosing in children. A total of 103 concentrations of risperidone and 112 concentrations of 9-OH-risperidone, collected from 62 pediatric patients (0.16–16.8 years of age), were used in the present study. The predictive performance of five published population pharmacokinetic models (four joint parent-metabolite models and one parent only) was assessed for accuracy and precision of the predictions using statistical criteria, goodness of fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPCs), and normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDEs). The tested models produced similarly precise predictions (Root Mean Square Error [RMSE]) ranging from 0.021 to 0.027 nmol/ml for risperidone and 0.053–0.065 nmol/ml for 9-OH-risperidone). However, one of the models (a one-compartment mixture model with clearance estimated for three subpopulations) developed with a rich dataset presented fewer biases (Mean Percent Error [MPE, %] of 1.0% vs. 101.4, 146.9, 260.4, and 292.4%) for risperidone. In contrast, a model developed with fewer data and a more similar population to the one used for the external evaluation presented fewer biases for 9-OH-risperidone (MPE: 17% vs. 69.9, 47.8, and 82.9%). None of the models evaluated seemed to be generalizable to the population used in this analysis. All the models had a modest predictive performance, potentially suggesting that sources of inter-individual variability were not entirely captured and that opportunistic data from a highly heterogeneous population are likely not the most appropriate data to evaluate risperidone models externally.
KW - pediatrics
KW - pharmacokinetics
KW - population modeling
KW - precision dosing
KW - risperidone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128298374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128298374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fphar.2022.817276
DO - 10.3389/fphar.2022.817276
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128298374
SN - 1663-9812
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Pharmacology
JF - Frontiers in Pharmacology
M1 - 817276
ER -