TY - JOUR
T1 - External validation of a model to predict recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival for patients with melanoma after sentinel node biopsy
AU - Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group
AU - Stassen, Robert C.
AU - Maas, Carolien C.H.M.
AU - Leong, Stanley P.
AU - Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
AU - White, Richard L.
AU - Pockaj, Barbara A.
AU - Zager, Jonathan S.
AU - Schneebaum, Schlomo
AU - Vetto, John T.
AU - Avisar, Eli
AU - Harrison Howard, J.
AU - O'donoghue, Cristina
AU - Kosiorek, Heidi
AU - Van Akkooi, Alexander C.J.
AU - Verhoef, Cornelis
AU - Van Klaveren, David
AU - Grünhagen, Dirk J.
AU - Olofsson Bagge, Roger
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Background: Recently, a model to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was published. The aim of this study was to validate that model in a large independent international cohort. Methods: The database of the Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group (SLNWG) was analysed for patients with malignant melanoma who underwent SLNB. Patients with clinical stage III melanoma, a history of other malignancies, or receiving concomitant systemic therapies during follow-up were excluded. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics in the eligible cohort. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of the model. Results: The external validation cohort consisted of 6174 patients of the SLNWG from the USA, Europe, and Israel. A positive sentinel node was found in 788 patients (12.8%). The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the external validation was 0.76 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 0.77) for RFS and 0.79 (95% c.i. 0.76 to 0.81) for MSS. The model was well calibrated, as the observed 5-year survival rates aligned closely with the predicted survival rates (calibration slope of 0.98 for RFS and calibration slope of 0.99 for MSS). The model provided a net benefit versus the 'treat all' and 'treat none' strategies at the predetermined probability threshold for recurrence of 45%. Conclusion: The model demonstrated good performance in a large heterogeneous independent cohort, emphasizing its robustness. Decision curve analysis revealed a clear net benefit of the model over a treat all strategy, highlighting its potential for clinical use.
AB - Background: Recently, a model to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was published. The aim of this study was to validate that model in a large independent international cohort. Methods: The database of the Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group (SLNWG) was analysed for patients with malignant melanoma who underwent SLNB. Patients with clinical stage III melanoma, a history of other malignancies, or receiving concomitant systemic therapies during follow-up were excluded. The model's predictive performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics in the eligible cohort. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical value of the model. Results: The external validation cohort consisted of 6174 patients of the SLNWG from the USA, Europe, and Israel. A positive sentinel node was found in 788 patients (12.8%). The area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the external validation was 0.76 (95% c.i. 0.74 to 0.77) for RFS and 0.79 (95% c.i. 0.76 to 0.81) for MSS. The model was well calibrated, as the observed 5-year survival rates aligned closely with the predicted survival rates (calibration slope of 0.98 for RFS and calibration slope of 0.99 for MSS). The model provided a net benefit versus the 'treat all' and 'treat none' strategies at the predetermined probability threshold for recurrence of 45%. Conclusion: The model demonstrated good performance in a large heterogeneous independent cohort, emphasizing its robustness. Decision curve analysis revealed a clear net benefit of the model over a treat all strategy, highlighting its potential for clinical use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003129438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105003129438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjs/znaf037
DO - 10.1093/bjs/znaf037
M3 - Article
C2 - 40243383
AN - SCOPUS:105003129438
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 112
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
M1 - znaf037
ER -