TY - JOUR
T1 - Feedback Related Potentials for EEG-Based Typing Systems
AU - Gonzalez-Navarro, Paula
AU - Celik, Basak
AU - Moghadamfalahi, Mohammad
AU - Akcakaya, Murat
AU - Fried-Oken, Melanie
AU - Erdoğmuş, Deniz
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NSF IIS-1149570, IIS-1118061, CNS-1136027, CNS-1544895, and SMA-0835976, by NIDR-H133E140026 and NIDLRR 90RE5017-02-01, and by NIH 5R01DC009834.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Gonzalez-Navarro, Celik, Moghadamfalahi, Akcakaya, Fried-Oken and Erdoğmuş.
PY - 2022/1/25
Y1 - 2022/1/25
N2 - Error related potentials (ErrP), which are elicited in the EEG in response to a perceived error, have been used for error correction and adaption in the event related potential (ERP)-based brain computer interfaces designed for typing. In these typing interfaces, ERP evidence is collected in response to a sequence of stimuli presented usually in the visual form and the intended user stimulus is probabilistically inferred (stimulus with highest probability) and presented to the user as the decision. If the inferred stimulus is incorrect, ErrP is expected to be elicited in the EEG. Early approaches to use ErrP in the design of typing interfaces attempt to make hard decisions on the perceived error such that the perceived error is corrected and either the sequence of stimuli are repeated to obtain further ERP evidence, or without further repetition the stimulus with the second highest probability is presented to the user as the decision of the system. Moreover, none of the existing approaches use a language model to increase the performance of typing. In this work, unlike the existing approaches, we study the potential benefits of fusing feedback related potentials (FRP), a form of ErrP, with ERP and context information (language model, LM) in a Bayesian fashion to detect the user intent. We present experimental results based on data from 12 healthy participants using RSVP Keyboard™ to complete a copy-phrase-task. Three paradigms are compared: [P1] uses only ERP/LM Bayesian fusion; [P2] each RSVP sequence is appended with the top candidate in the alphabet according to posterior after ERP evidence fusion; corresponding FRP is then incorporated; and [P3] the top candidate is shown as a prospect to generate FRP evidence only if its posterior exceeds a threshold. Analyses indicate that ERP/LM/FRP evidence fusion during decision making yields significant speed-accuracy benefits for the user.
AB - Error related potentials (ErrP), which are elicited in the EEG in response to a perceived error, have been used for error correction and adaption in the event related potential (ERP)-based brain computer interfaces designed for typing. In these typing interfaces, ERP evidence is collected in response to a sequence of stimuli presented usually in the visual form and the intended user stimulus is probabilistically inferred (stimulus with highest probability) and presented to the user as the decision. If the inferred stimulus is incorrect, ErrP is expected to be elicited in the EEG. Early approaches to use ErrP in the design of typing interfaces attempt to make hard decisions on the perceived error such that the perceived error is corrected and either the sequence of stimuli are repeated to obtain further ERP evidence, or without further repetition the stimulus with the second highest probability is presented to the user as the decision of the system. Moreover, none of the existing approaches use a language model to increase the performance of typing. In this work, unlike the existing approaches, we study the potential benefits of fusing feedback related potentials (FRP), a form of ErrP, with ERP and context information (language model, LM) in a Bayesian fashion to detect the user intent. We present experimental results based on data from 12 healthy participants using RSVP Keyboard™ to complete a copy-phrase-task. Three paradigms are compared: [P1] uses only ERP/LM Bayesian fusion; [P2] each RSVP sequence is appended with the top candidate in the alphabet according to posterior after ERP evidence fusion; corresponding FRP is then incorporated; and [P3] the top candidate is shown as a prospect to generate FRP evidence only if its posterior exceeds a threshold. Analyses indicate that ERP/LM/FRP evidence fusion during decision making yields significant speed-accuracy benefits for the user.
KW - Bayesian fusion
KW - RSVP Keyboard
KW - brain computer interfaces
KW - electroencephalography
KW - error related potentials
KW - event related potentials
KW - feedback related potentials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124323237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124323237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2021.788258
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2021.788258
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124323237
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
M1 - 788258
ER -