TY - JOUR
T1 - Gingivoperiosteoplasty in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate
T2 - The Need for Alveolar Bone Grafting
AU - Balumuka, Darius
AU - Daly, Gwendolyn E.
AU - Krakauer, Kelsi
AU - Burch, Samantha
AU - Jedrzejewski, Breanna
AU - Johnson, Alicia
AU - Howell, Lori K.
AU - Wolfswinkel, Erik M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Design/Setting: Retrospective university hospital single center study. Patients: Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded. Interventions: Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measure: The need for ABG. Results: Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P =.004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P =.022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P =.015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P =.004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG. Conclusion: GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Design/Setting: Retrospective university hospital single center study. Patients: Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded. Interventions: Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis. Main Outcome Measure: The need for ABG. Results: Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P =.004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P =.022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P =.015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P =.004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG. Conclusion: GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.
KW - bone grafting
KW - cleft lip and palate
KW - nasoalveolar molding
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193956928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193956928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10556656241256917
DO - 10.1177/10556656241256917
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193956928
SN - 1055-6656
JO - Cleft Palate Journal
JF - Cleft Palate Journal
ER -