TY - JOUR
T1 - How well do we understand our patients’ perioperative experience? A qualitative analysis of themes derived from patient-centric resident conferences
AU - Schepergerdes, Benjamin
AU - Standage, Hayley
AU - Wetzel, Cate
AU - Kelley, Katherine A.
AU - Brasel, Karen
AU - Hoops, Heather
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant funding from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as part of the Back to Bedside Initiative.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: Patient-centric resident conferences (PCRCs) provide meaningful time to connect with and learn from patients. This qualitative study explores themes of patients’ perioperative experiences from PCRCs through patient and resident perspectives. Methods: General Surgery residents participated in six PCRCs, which include condensed standard didactics to accommodate a patient panel regarding their perioperative experience. Panel transcripts and resident survey responses describing what they learned were coded using grounded theory methodology. Themes were evaluated and compared. Results: 76 identified codes were grouped into major categories: “Medical/Surgical Knowledge,” “Patient Perspective,” “Patient-Physician Relationship,” and “Communication.” Themes from resident responses predominantly paralleled patient discussion, with common themes including “impact of disease and surgery on patient” and “compassion/empathy.” “Medical/surgical knowledge” was only present in resident responses while themes regarding quality of life were more frequent in patient transcripts. Conclusions: PCRCs are a valuable tool in resident education to understand patients’ perioperative experiences. Themes from patient panels complement, but do not replace, information covered in didactic lectures.
AB - Background: Patient-centric resident conferences (PCRCs) provide meaningful time to connect with and learn from patients. This qualitative study explores themes of patients’ perioperative experiences from PCRCs through patient and resident perspectives. Methods: General Surgery residents participated in six PCRCs, which include condensed standard didactics to accommodate a patient panel regarding their perioperative experience. Panel transcripts and resident survey responses describing what they learned were coded using grounded theory methodology. Themes were evaluated and compared. Results: 76 identified codes were grouped into major categories: “Medical/Surgical Knowledge,” “Patient Perspective,” “Patient-Physician Relationship,” and “Communication.” Themes from resident responses predominantly paralleled patient discussion, with common themes including “impact of disease and surgery on patient” and “compassion/empathy.” “Medical/surgical knowledge” was only present in resident responses while themes regarding quality of life were more frequent in patient transcripts. Conclusions: PCRCs are a valuable tool in resident education to understand patients’ perioperative experiences. Themes from patient panels complement, but do not replace, information covered in didactic lectures.
KW - Patient perspective
KW - Patient-centric resident conferences
KW - Patient-physician relationship
KW - Perioperative experience
KW - Surgical resident education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148704284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148704284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 36737398
AN - SCOPUS:85148704284
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 225
SP - 819
EP - 823
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 5
ER -