Image-guided treatment in the hepatobiliary system: Role of imaging in treatment planning and posttreatment evaluation

Surabhi Bajpai, Avinash Kambadakone, Alexander R. Guimaraes, Ronald S. Arellano, Debra A. Gervais, Dushyant Sahani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


In the past decade, image-guided targeted treatments such as percutaneous ablation, intra-arterial embolic therapies, and targeted radiation therapy have shown substantial promise in management of hepatobiliary malignancies. Imaging is integral to patient selection, treatment delivery, and assessment of treatment effectiveness. Preprocedural imaging is crucial and allows local tumor staging, evaluation of surrounding structures, and selection of suitable therapeutic options and strategies for treatment delivery. Postprocedural imaging is required to monitor therapeutic success, detect residual or recurrent disease, and identify procedure-related complications to guide appropriate future therapy. Technical innovations in cross-sectional imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, combined with advances in image postprocessing and new types of contrast agents, allow precise morphologic assessment and functional evaluation of hepatobiliary tumors. Advanced postprocessing techniques such as image fusion and volumetric assessment not only facilitate procedural planning and treatment delivery but also enhance posttreatment imaging surveillance. In addition, molecular imaging techniques such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET), PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging offer opportunities to evaluate various physiologic properties of tumors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1393-1418
Number of pages26
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Image-guided treatment in the hepatobiliary system: Role of imaging in treatment planning and posttreatment evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this