TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the volume, cost, and outcomes of cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States
AU - Altibi, Ahmed M.
AU - Hashem, Anas
AU - Ghanem, Fares
AU - Sanghai, Saket
AU - Nazer, Babak
AU - Stecker, Eric C.
AU - Henrikson, Charles A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Heart Rhythm Society
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, professional societies recommended deferral of elective procedures for optimal resource utilization. Objective: We sought to assess changes in procedural trends and outcomes of electrophysiology (EP) procedures during the pandemic. Methods: National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify all EP procedures performed in the United States (2016–2020) by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We evaluated trends in utilization, cost/revenue, and outcomes from EP procedures performed. Results: An estimated 1.35 million EP procedures (82% devices and 18% catheter ablations) were performed (2016–2020) with significant yearly uptrend. During the pandemic, there was a substantial decline in EP procedure utilization from a 5-year peak of 298 cases/million population in the second quarter of 2019 to a nadir of 220 cases in the second quarter of 2020. In 2020, the pandemic was associated with the loss of 50,233 projected EP procedures (39,337 devices and 10,896 ablations) with subsequent revenue loss of $7.06 billion. This deficit was driven by revenue deficit from dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) utilization ($2.88 billion, 49.3% of lost cases), ablation procedures ($1.84 billion, 21.7% of lost cases), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation ($1.36 billion, 12.0% of lost cases). To the contrary, there was a 9.4% increase in the utilization of leadless PPM. EP device implantation during the pandemic was associated with higher adverse in-hospital events (9.4% vs 8.0%; P < .001). Conclusion: In the United States, the significant decline in EP procedures during the pandemic was primarily driven by the reduction in dual-chamber PPM utilization, followed by arrhythmia ablation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. There was a substantial increase in leadless PPM utilization during the pandemic.
AB - Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, professional societies recommended deferral of elective procedures for optimal resource utilization. Objective: We sought to assess changes in procedural trends and outcomes of electrophysiology (EP) procedures during the pandemic. Methods: National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify all EP procedures performed in the United States (2016–2020) by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We evaluated trends in utilization, cost/revenue, and outcomes from EP procedures performed. Results: An estimated 1.35 million EP procedures (82% devices and 18% catheter ablations) were performed (2016–2020) with significant yearly uptrend. During the pandemic, there was a substantial decline in EP procedure utilization from a 5-year peak of 298 cases/million population in the second quarter of 2019 to a nadir of 220 cases in the second quarter of 2020. In 2020, the pandemic was associated with the loss of 50,233 projected EP procedures (39,337 devices and 10,896 ablations) with subsequent revenue loss of $7.06 billion. This deficit was driven by revenue deficit from dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) utilization ($2.88 billion, 49.3% of lost cases), ablation procedures ($1.84 billion, 21.7% of lost cases), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation ($1.36 billion, 12.0% of lost cases). To the contrary, there was a 9.4% increase in the utilization of leadless PPM. EP device implantation during the pandemic was associated with higher adverse in-hospital events (9.4% vs 8.0%; P < .001). Conclusion: In the United States, the significant decline in EP procedures during the pandemic was primarily driven by the reduction in dual-chamber PPM utilization, followed by arrhythmia ablation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. There was a substantial increase in leadless PPM utilization during the pandemic.
KW - Ablation
KW - Arrhythmia
KW - COVID-19
KW - Electrophysiology
KW - Permanent pacemaker
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190103422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85190103422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.047
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 38417597
AN - SCOPUS:85190103422
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 21
SP - 1121
EP - 1131
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 7
ER -