TY - JOUR
T1 - In search of a better mouse test
AU - Wahlsten, Douglas
AU - Rustay, Nathan R.
AU - Metten, Pamela
AU - Crabbe, John C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Our work is supported by grants from the National Science and Engineering Research Council, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and USPHS Grants AA12714, AA10276, AA13464, AA06243 and DA 05828. We thank Molly Bogue of the Mouse Phenome Project for information used to generate Fig. 2 , and Deborah Finn and René Hen for help with the investigation shown in Fig. 3 .
PY - 2003/3/1
Y1 - 2003/3/1
N2 - To elucidate pathways from specific genes to complex behaviors, assays of mouse behavior need to be valid, reliable and replicable across laboratories. Behavioral assays are proving to be as complex as the intricate cellular and molecular pathways that are the main interest of many mouse users. There is no perfect behavioral test, but we propose some aphorisms to stimulate discussion that is necessary for continued progress in task development. For maximal utility, a behavioral test should yield valid data for most of the commonly used inbred mouse strains. Tests of simple, ubiquitous behaviors usually yield meaningful data for most mice, especially when based on automated scoring or on simple physical measures that are likely to be replicable across laboratories. Extreme test scores resulting from non-performance on a task can inflate the apparent reliability of a test, and devious adaptations to a task can undermine its validity. The optimal apparatus configuration for certain genetic or pharmacological analyses might depend on the particular laboratory environment. Despite our best efforts, the mice will continue to win some innings.
AB - To elucidate pathways from specific genes to complex behaviors, assays of mouse behavior need to be valid, reliable and replicable across laboratories. Behavioral assays are proving to be as complex as the intricate cellular and molecular pathways that are the main interest of many mouse users. There is no perfect behavioral test, but we propose some aphorisms to stimulate discussion that is necessary for continued progress in task development. For maximal utility, a behavioral test should yield valid data for most of the commonly used inbred mouse strains. Tests of simple, ubiquitous behaviors usually yield meaningful data for most mice, especially when based on automated scoring or on simple physical measures that are likely to be replicable across laboratories. Extreme test scores resulting from non-performance on a task can inflate the apparent reliability of a test, and devious adaptations to a task can undermine its validity. The optimal apparatus configuration for certain genetic or pharmacological analyses might depend on the particular laboratory environment. Despite our best efforts, the mice will continue to win some innings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037362987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037362987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00033-X
DO - 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00033-X
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12591215
AN - SCOPUS:0037362987
SN - 0378-5912
VL - 26
SP - 132
EP - 136
JO - Trends in Neurosciences
JF - Trends in Neurosciences
IS - 3
ER -