Abstract
Background: The significance of a contralateral breast cancer is largely unknown, making prophylactic mastectomy controversial. Methods: Differences between stages of initial and contralateral cancers were determined by t test. Survival distributions were compared by log-rank analyses and compared with Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data for unilateral cancers. Results: Metachronous contralateral cancers occurred at a rate of .13% per year and were of significantly lower stage. Metachronous cancers adversely impacted survival for patients with low-stage initial cancers, but the interval between cancers was less than 36 months. Synchronous tumors occurred in 2.3% of patients; survival was worse than for patients with metachronous cancers. Conclusions: Prophylactic mastectomy is unlikely to be beneficial because of the lower stages and low incidence of second cancers, even for patients with initial low-stage cancers.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 645-650 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | American journal of surgery |
| Volume | 195 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2008 |
Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Contralateral
- Metachronous
- Synchronous
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence and outcomes of contralateral breast cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS