TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions about Antibiotic Stewardship Programs among Neonatology Trainees
AU - Kalu, Ibukunoluwa C.
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Sagori
AU - Dukhovny, Dmitry
AU - Young, Rebecca
AU - Guzman-Cottrill, Judith A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge Arjun Srinivasan, MD, and Karen Puopolo, MD, PhD, for editorial feedback on survey questions and support for this research. They also thank the members of SHEA Pediatric Leadership Council for supporting this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/31
Y1 - 2020/12/31
N2 - Objective Antibiotic stewardship should be an essential component of neonatology training as neonatal intensive care units (NICU) have unique stewardship needs. Our aim was to assess neonatology fellowship trainees' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about antibiotic stewardship to inform sustainable curriculum development. Study Design We distributed an electronic survey to neonatology fellows in the United States over 4 months (January-April 2018) via Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program directors. Results Of 99 programs in the United States with an estimated 700 fellows, 159 (23%) fellows from 52 training programs (53%) responded to the survey and 139 (87%) provided analyzed responses. Majority of respondents were training in southern (59; 42%) and northeastern (43; 31%) regions and were equally spread across all 3 years of training. One hundred (72%) respondents reported an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in their institution. While 86% (120/139) were able to identify the components of an ASP, 59% (82/139) either did not or were unsure if they had received antibiotic stewardship training during fellowship. Furthermore, while answering case studies, 124 (89%) respondents identified the optimal antibiotic for methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection and 69 (50%) respondents chose appropriate empiric antibiotics for neonatal meningitis. Notably, fellowship training year was not significantly related to the proportion of incorrect knowledge responses (p = 0.40). Most survey respondents (81; 59%) identified small group sessions as the most useful teaching format, while others chose audit and feedback of individual prescribing behavior (52; 38%) and didactic lectures (52; 38%). Finally, ninety-five (69%) respondents preferred trainee-led ASP interventions targeting focal areas such as antifungal and surgical prophylaxis. Conclusion Antibiotic stewardship is a critical part of neonatology training. Neonatology fellows report variation in access to ASP during their training. Fellows prefer dedicated trainee-led interventions and stewardship curriculum taught within small group settings to promote targeted NICU ASP. Key Points Most neonatology programs expose trainees to internal or external antibiotic stewardship programs. Over half of fellow trainees are unsure about receiving targeted antibiotic stewardship training. Most neonatology fellows prefer a trainee-led antibiotic stewardship intervention.
AB - Objective Antibiotic stewardship should be an essential component of neonatology training as neonatal intensive care units (NICU) have unique stewardship needs. Our aim was to assess neonatology fellowship trainees' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about antibiotic stewardship to inform sustainable curriculum development. Study Design We distributed an electronic survey to neonatology fellows in the United States over 4 months (January-April 2018) via Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education program directors. Results Of 99 programs in the United States with an estimated 700 fellows, 159 (23%) fellows from 52 training programs (53%) responded to the survey and 139 (87%) provided analyzed responses. Majority of respondents were training in southern (59; 42%) and northeastern (43; 31%) regions and were equally spread across all 3 years of training. One hundred (72%) respondents reported an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in their institution. While 86% (120/139) were able to identify the components of an ASP, 59% (82/139) either did not or were unsure if they had received antibiotic stewardship training during fellowship. Furthermore, while answering case studies, 124 (89%) respondents identified the optimal antibiotic for methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection and 69 (50%) respondents chose appropriate empiric antibiotics for neonatal meningitis. Notably, fellowship training year was not significantly related to the proportion of incorrect knowledge responses (p = 0.40). Most survey respondents (81; 59%) identified small group sessions as the most useful teaching format, while others chose audit and feedback of individual prescribing behavior (52; 38%) and didactic lectures (52; 38%). Finally, ninety-five (69%) respondents preferred trainee-led ASP interventions targeting focal areas such as antifungal and surgical prophylaxis. Conclusion Antibiotic stewardship is a critical part of neonatology training. Neonatology fellows report variation in access to ASP during their training. Fellows prefer dedicated trainee-led interventions and stewardship curriculum taught within small group settings to promote targeted NICU ASP. Key Points Most neonatology programs expose trainees to internal or external antibiotic stewardship programs. Over half of fellow trainees are unsure about receiving targeted antibiotic stewardship training. Most neonatology fellows prefer a trainee-led antibiotic stewardship intervention.
KW - antibiotic resistance
KW - curriculum development
KW - neonates
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111299470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111299470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0041-1732418
DO - 10.1055/s-0041-1732418
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111299470
SN - 0735-1631
VL - 40
SP - 893
EP - 897
JO - American journal of perinatology
JF - American journal of perinatology
IS - 8
ER -