TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of suspected opioid overdose with naloxone in out-of-hospital settings
AU - Chou, Roger
AU - Todd Korthuis, P.
AU - McCarty, Dennis
AU - Coffin, Phillip O.
AU - Griffin, Jessica C.
AU - Davis-O'Reilly, Cynthia
AU - Grusing, Sara
AU - Daya, Mohamud
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded under contract no. HHSA290-2015-00009-I from the AHRQ, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Staff from the AHRQ assisted in developing the scope and key questions. A representative from the AHRQ served as a Contracting Officer's Technical Representative and provided technical assistance during the conduct of the full evidence report and comments on draft versions of the report. The AHRQ did not directly participate in the literature search, determination of study eligibility criteria, data analysis, or interpretation.
Funding Information:
Disclosures: Dr. Chou reports a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr. Korthuis reports grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study. Dr. McCarty reports a task order from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study, a cooperative agreement with the National Institute on Drug Abuse outside the submitted work, and grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute on Drug Abuse outside the submitted work. Dr. Coffin reports that he has directed National Institutes of Health–funded studies that received study medications donated by Alkermes (extended-release naltrexone [2014 to 2015]) and Gilead Sciences (le-dipasvir–sofosbuvir [2016 to 2017]). Dr. Daya reports a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Authors not named here have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOf InterestForms.do?msNum=M17-2224.
Funding Information:
Disclaimer: This article is based on research conducted by the Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under contract with the AHRQ (contract HHSA290-2015-00009-I). The findings and conclusions are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of the AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of the AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Physicians.
PY - 2017/12/19
Y1 - 2017/12/19
N2 - Background: Naloxone is effective for reversing opioid overdose, but optimal strategies for out-of-hospital use are uncertain. Purpose: To synthesize evidence on 1) the effects of naloxone route of administration and dosing for suspected opioid overdose in out-of-hospital settings on mortality, reversal of overdose, and harms, and 2) the need for transport to a health care facility after reversal of overdose with naloxone. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE (1946 through September 2017), PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) materials, and reference lists. Study Selection: English-language cohort studies and randomized trials that compared different doses of naloxone, administration routes, or transport versus nontransport after reversal of overdose with naloxone. Main outcomes were mortality, reversal of overdose, recurrence of overdose, and harms. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and quality assessment of individual studies; consensus assessment of overall strength of evidence (SOE). Data Synthesis: Of 13 eligible studies, 3 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies compared different administration routes. At the same dose (2 mg), 1 trial found similar efficacy between higher-concentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/mL) and intramuscular naloxone, and 1 trial found that lowerconcentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/5 mL) was less effective than intramuscular naloxone but was associated with decreased risk for agitation (low SOE). Evidence was insufficient to evaluate other comparisons of route of administration. Six uncontrolled studies reported low rates of death and serious adverse events (0% to 1.25%) in nontransported patients after successful naloxone treatment. Limitation: There were few studies, all had methodological limitations, and none evaluated FDA-Approved autoinjectors or highly concentrated intranasal formulations. Conclusion: Higher-concentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/ mL) seems to have efficacy similar to that of intramuscular naloxone for reversal of opioid overdose, with no difference in adverse events. Nontransport after reversal of overdose with naloxone seems to be associated with a low rate of serious harms, but no study evaluated risks of transport versus nontransport. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42016053891)
AB - Background: Naloxone is effective for reversing opioid overdose, but optimal strategies for out-of-hospital use are uncertain. Purpose: To synthesize evidence on 1) the effects of naloxone route of administration and dosing for suspected opioid overdose in out-of-hospital settings on mortality, reversal of overdose, and harms, and 2) the need for transport to a health care facility after reversal of overdose with naloxone. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE (1946 through September 2017), PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) materials, and reference lists. Study Selection: English-language cohort studies and randomized trials that compared different doses of naloxone, administration routes, or transport versus nontransport after reversal of overdose with naloxone. Main outcomes were mortality, reversal of overdose, recurrence of overdose, and harms. Data Extraction: Dual extraction and quality assessment of individual studies; consensus assessment of overall strength of evidence (SOE). Data Synthesis: Of 13 eligible studies, 3 randomized controlled trials and 4 cohort studies compared different administration routes. At the same dose (2 mg), 1 trial found similar efficacy between higher-concentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/mL) and intramuscular naloxone, and 1 trial found that lowerconcentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/5 mL) was less effective than intramuscular naloxone but was associated with decreased risk for agitation (low SOE). Evidence was insufficient to evaluate other comparisons of route of administration. Six uncontrolled studies reported low rates of death and serious adverse events (0% to 1.25%) in nontransported patients after successful naloxone treatment. Limitation: There were few studies, all had methodological limitations, and none evaluated FDA-Approved autoinjectors or highly concentrated intranasal formulations. Conclusion: Higher-concentration intranasal naloxone (2 mg/ mL) seems to have efficacy similar to that of intramuscular naloxone for reversal of opioid overdose, with no difference in adverse events. Nontransport after reversal of overdose with naloxone seems to be associated with a low rate of serious harms, but no study evaluated risks of transport versus nontransport. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42016053891)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038573130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038573130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M17-2224
DO - 10.7326/M17-2224
M3 - Article
C2 - 29181532
AN - SCOPUS:85038573130
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 167
SP - 867
EP - 875
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 12
ER -