TY - JOUR
T1 - Medicaid Eligibility Expansion Regardless of Immigration Status and Insurance Coverage Among Latinos Seen in Community Health Centers, 2018–2023
AU - Huguet, Nathalie
AU - Kaufmann, Jorge
AU - Holderness, Heather
AU - Erroba, Jeremy
AU - Mertes, Gretchen
AU - Steeves-Reece, Anna
AU - Springer, Rachel
AU - Heintzman, John
AU - Marino, Miguel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Objectives. To assess whether Latino patients receiving care in community-based health centers (CHCs) in US states that expanded Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status to adults 50 years and older had greater insurance coverage after the eligibility amendment compared with states that did not expand eligibility. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from 40 602 nonpregnant CHC patients aged 50 to 64 years living in states that expanded eligibility (OR, CA) or that did not (AK, CT, IN, MN, MT, NC, NJ, OH, WA) with a visit in both 2018–2019 (before policy change) and 2021–2023 (after policy change). Results. Among Spanish-preferring Latinas, the overall Medicaid-insured difference-in-difference estimate across all 3 years after the amendment was positively moderate (average treatment effect on treated [ATT] 5 17.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5 0.10, 13.98); however, this effect was greatest in the third year after the amendment (ATT 5 121.82; 95% CI 5 14.04, 29.59), and this was accompanied by a substantial drop in third year uninsured visit rates (ATT 5 215.45; 95% CI 5 224.77, –6.13). We observed the same pattern for Spanish-preferring Latinos. Conclusions. The findings suggest that expanding Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status improved access to health insurance for some Latino communities..
AB - Objectives. To assess whether Latino patients receiving care in community-based health centers (CHCs) in US states that expanded Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status to adults 50 years and older had greater insurance coverage after the eligibility amendment compared with states that did not expand eligibility. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study, using electronic health record data from 40 602 nonpregnant CHC patients aged 50 to 64 years living in states that expanded eligibility (OR, CA) or that did not (AK, CT, IN, MN, MT, NC, NJ, OH, WA) with a visit in both 2018–2019 (before policy change) and 2021–2023 (after policy change). Results. Among Spanish-preferring Latinas, the overall Medicaid-insured difference-in-difference estimate across all 3 years after the amendment was positively moderate (average treatment effect on treated [ATT] 5 17.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5 0.10, 13.98); however, this effect was greatest in the third year after the amendment (ATT 5 121.82; 95% CI 5 14.04, 29.59), and this was accompanied by a substantial drop in third year uninsured visit rates (ATT 5 215.45; 95% CI 5 224.77, –6.13). We observed the same pattern for Spanish-preferring Latinos. Conclusions. The findings suggest that expanding Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status improved access to health insurance for some Latino communities..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005190583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105005190583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308052
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308052
M3 - Article
C2 - 40179344
AN - SCOPUS:105005190583
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 115
SP - 900
EP - 909
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 6
ER -