Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series

Rudolf J. Stadlhuber, Amr El Sherif, Sumeet K. Mittal, Robert J. Fitzgibbons, L. Michael Brunt, John G. Hunter, Tom R. DeMeester, Lee L. Swanstrom, C. Daniel Smith, Charles J. Filipi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

276 Scopus citations


Background: Primary laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is associated with up to a 42% recurrence rate. This has lead to the use of mesh for crural repair, which has resulted in an improved recurrence rate (0-24%). However, mesh complications have been observed. Methods: We compiled two cases, and our senior author contacted other experienced esophageal surgeons who provided 26 additional cases with mesh-related complications. Care was taken to retrieve technical operative details concerning mesh size and shape and implantation technique used. Results: Twenty-six patients underwent laparoscopic and two patients open surgery for large hiatal hernia (n = 28). Twenty-five patients had a concomitant Nissen fundoplication, two a Toupet fundoplication, and one a Watson fundoplication. Mesh types placed were polypropylene (n = 8), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (n = 12), biological mesh (n = 7), and dual mesh (n = 1). Presenting symptoms associated with mesh complications were dysphagia (n = 22), heartburn (n = 10), chest pain (n = 14), fever (n = 1), epigastric pain (n = 2), and weight loss (n = 4). Main reoperative findings were intraluminal mesh erosion (n = 17), esophageal stenosis (n = 6), and dense fibrosis (n = 5). Six patients required esophagectomy, two patients had partial gastrectomy, and 1 patient had total gastrectomy. Five patients did not require surgery. In this group one patient had mesh removal by endoscopy. There was no immediate postoperative mortality, however one patient has severe gastroparesis and five patients are dependent on tube feeding. Two patients died 3 months postoperatively of unknown cause. There is no apparent relationship between mesh type and configuration with the complications encountered. Conclusion: Complications related to synthetic mesh placement at the esophageal hiatus are more common than previously reported. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the best method and type of mesh for implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1219-1226
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2009


  • Esophageal perforation
  • Hiatal hernia
  • Mesh
  • Mesh erosion
  • Prosthetic hiatoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: A 28-case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this