TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-invasive, serum DNA pregnancy testing leading to incidental discovery of cancer
T2 - A good thing?
AU - Prasad, Vinay
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Cell-free DNA for perinatal screening is a growing industry. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is based on the premise that foetal DNA is able to cross the placental barrier and enter the mother's circulation, where it can be examined for chromosomal abnormalities, such as trisomy 13, 18 or 21. Such tests are expected to be widely used by pregnant women, with the annual market expected to surpass $1 billion. Recently, a number of case reports have emerged in the haematology-oncology literature. The routine use of NIPT has led to the discovery of maternal neoplasms. Most writers have concluded that this is yet another benefit of the test; however, a closer examination of the cases reveals that this incidental detection may not improve patient outcomes. In some cases, early detection provides lead time bias, but does not change the ultimate clinical outcome, and in other cases, detection constitutes earlier knowledge of a cancer whose natural history cannot be altered. Here, we explore in detail cases where cancer was incidentally discovered among women undergoing routine non-invasive pregnancy testing, and investigate whether or not these women were benefitted by the discovery.
AB - Cell-free DNA for perinatal screening is a growing industry. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is based on the premise that foetal DNA is able to cross the placental barrier and enter the mother's circulation, where it can be examined for chromosomal abnormalities, such as trisomy 13, 18 or 21. Such tests are expected to be widely used by pregnant women, with the annual market expected to surpass $1 billion. Recently, a number of case reports have emerged in the haematology-oncology literature. The routine use of NIPT has led to the discovery of maternal neoplasms. Most writers have concluded that this is yet another benefit of the test; however, a closer examination of the cases reveals that this incidental detection may not improve patient outcomes. In some cases, early detection provides lead time bias, but does not change the ultimate clinical outcome, and in other cases, detection constitutes earlier knowledge of a cancer whose natural history cannot be altered. Here, we explore in detail cases where cancer was incidentally discovered among women undergoing routine non-invasive pregnancy testing, and investigate whether or not these women were benefitted by the discovery.
KW - Genetic testing
KW - Lead-time bias
KW - Non-invasive pregnancy tests
KW - Overdiagnosis
KW - Unintended consequences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943663687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943663687&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.029
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.029
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 26278647
AN - SCOPUS:84943663687
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 51
SP - 2272
EP - 2274
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 16
ER -