TY - JOUR
T1 - Nose to tail, roots to shoots
T2 - Spatial descriptors for phenotypic diversity in the Biological Spatial Ontology
AU - Dahdul, Wasila M.
AU - Cui, Hong
AU - Mabee, Paula M.
AU - Mungall, Christopher J.
AU - Osumi-Sutherland, David
AU - Walls, Ramona L.
AU - Haendel, Melissa A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Robert Thacker and Marymegan Daly for useful discussion on poriferan and cnidarian axes, and Dennis W. Stevenson and Pankaj Jaiswal for discussions on plant spatial terminology. We thank Anya Broverman-Wray for her expert preparation of the illustrations. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers DBI-0641025, DBI-1062404, and DBI-1062542 to PMM and TJV, and supported
Funding Information:
by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center under NSF EF-0423641 and NSF EF-0905606, as well as NIH 5R24OD011883 to MAH and CJM. We are grateful for support from the Phenotype Ontology Research Coordination Network; NSF-DBI-0956049; http://www.phenotypercn.org/. RLW was supported by NSF DBI-0735191 for a portion of this work, and CJM was supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 for a portion of this work. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Dahdul et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
PY - 2014/8/11
Y1 - 2014/8/11
N2 - Background: Spatial terminology is used in anatomy to indicate precise, relative positions of structures in an organism. While these terms are often standardized within specific fields of biology, they can differ dramatically across taxa. Such differences in usage can impair our ability to unambiguously refer to anatomical position when comparing anatomy or phenotypes across species. We developed the Biological Spatial Ontology (BSPO) to standardize the description of spatial and topological relationships across taxa to enable the discovery of comparable phenotypes. Results: BSPO currently contains 146 classes and 58 relations representing anatomical axes, gradients, regions, planes, sides, and surfaces. These concepts can be used at multiple biological scales and in a diversity of taxa, including plants, animals and fungi. The BSPO is used to provide a source of anatomical location descriptors for logically defining anatomical entity classes in anatomy ontologies. Spatial reasoning is further enhanced in anatomy ontologies by integrating spatial relations such as dorsal_to into class descriptions (e.g., 'dorsolateral placode' dorsal_to some 'epibranchial placode').Conclusions: The BSPO is currently used by projects that require standardized anatomical descriptors for phenotype annotation and ontology integration across a diversity of taxa. Anatomical location classes are also useful for describing phenotypic differences, such as morphological variation in position of structures resulting from evolution within and across species.
AB - Background: Spatial terminology is used in anatomy to indicate precise, relative positions of structures in an organism. While these terms are often standardized within specific fields of biology, they can differ dramatically across taxa. Such differences in usage can impair our ability to unambiguously refer to anatomical position when comparing anatomy or phenotypes across species. We developed the Biological Spatial Ontology (BSPO) to standardize the description of spatial and topological relationships across taxa to enable the discovery of comparable phenotypes. Results: BSPO currently contains 146 classes and 58 relations representing anatomical axes, gradients, regions, planes, sides, and surfaces. These concepts can be used at multiple biological scales and in a diversity of taxa, including plants, animals and fungi. The BSPO is used to provide a source of anatomical location descriptors for logically defining anatomical entity classes in anatomy ontologies. Spatial reasoning is further enhanced in anatomy ontologies by integrating spatial relations such as dorsal_to into class descriptions (e.g., 'dorsolateral placode' dorsal_to some 'epibranchial placode').Conclusions: The BSPO is currently used by projects that require standardized anatomical descriptors for phenotype annotation and ontology integration across a diversity of taxa. Anatomical location classes are also useful for describing phenotypic differences, such as morphological variation in position of structures resulting from evolution within and across species.
KW - Anatomy
KW - Axes
KW - BSPO
KW - Ontology
KW - Phenotype
KW - Position
KW - Reasoning
KW - Spatial relationships
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923857602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923857602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/2041-1480-5-34
DO - 10.1186/2041-1480-5-34
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84923857602
SN - 2041-1480
VL - 5
JO - Journal of Biomedical Semantics
JF - Journal of Biomedical Semantics
IS - 1
M1 - 34
ER -