TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
T2 - A retrospective single-center study
AU - Estoos, Ethan M.
AU - Jocham, Kevin P.
AU - Zhang, Chengda
AU - Benson, Lauren M.
AU - Milas, Anamaria
AU - Zakhary, Bishoy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H2O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H2O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H2O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (27% vs. 11%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed.
AB - While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H2O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0–3 cm H2O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H2O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (27% vs. 11%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23–9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed.
KW - COVID-19
KW - ECMO
KW - Manometry
KW - Mechanical ventilation
KW - Positive end-expiratory pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147822516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147822516&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154274
M3 - Article
C2 - 36764115
AN - SCOPUS:85147822516
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 75
JO - Seminars in Anesthesia
JF - Seminars in Anesthesia
M1 - 154274
ER -