TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of primary care among black Americans using patient portals
T2 - Qualitative study
AU - Ordaz, Omar H.
AU - Croff, Raina L.
AU - Robinson, La Troy D.
AU - Shea, Steven A.
AU - Bowles, Nicole P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a research supplement to R01 HL142064, the parent grant (SAS). Support was also provided by KL2TR002370 (NPB) and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences at Oregon Health & Science University through funds from the Division of Consumer and Business Services of the State of Oregon (ORS 656.630). The parent study received support from UL1TR000128 (Oregon Clinical & Translational Research Institute). The authors would like to thank Shelby L Watkins (Masters in Public Health), for providing NVivo training to OHO and assistance with coding; Martina A Shannon for help with interview transcription; and members of the PreSERVE Coalition for Black/African American Memory & Brain Health who helped inform the interview questions and provided resources for parent study recruitment.
Publisher Copyright:
©Omar H Ordaz, Raina L Croff, LaTroy D Robinson, Steven A Shea, Nicole P Bowles.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Reduced patient portal use has previously been reported among Black Americans when compared with that of the general population. This statistic is concerning because portals have been shown to improve the control of chronic conditions that are more prevalent and severe in Black Americans. At their very simplest, portals allow patients to access their electronic health records and often provide tools for patients to interact with their own health information, treatment team members, and insurance companies. However, research suggests that Black American patients have greater concerns over a lack of support, loss of privacy, and reduced personalization of care compared with other Americans, which results in a disparity of portal use. Objective: This qualitative investigation of primary care experiences of Black Americans from across the United States who participated in remote focus groups in April and May 2020 aims to explore the use and perceived value of patient portals to better understand any barriers to optimized treatment in the primary care setting. Methods: We performed an inductive thematic analysis of 8 remote focus group interviews with 29 Black American patients aged 30-60 years to qualitatively assess the experiences of Black American patients with regular access to portals. Results: Thematic analysis uncovered the following interrelated themes regarding patient portals in primary care: the optimization of care, patient empowerment, patient-provider communication, and patient burden. Conclusions: In contrast to what has been described regarding the reluctance of Black Americans to engage with patient portals, our focus groups revealed the general acceptance of patient portals, which were described overwhelmingly as tools with the potential for providing exceptional, personalized care that may even work to mitigate the unfair burden of disease for Black Americans in primary care settings. Thus, opportunities for better health care will clearly arise with increased communication, experience, and adoption of remote health care practices among Black Americans.
AB - Background: Reduced patient portal use has previously been reported among Black Americans when compared with that of the general population. This statistic is concerning because portals have been shown to improve the control of chronic conditions that are more prevalent and severe in Black Americans. At their very simplest, portals allow patients to access their electronic health records and often provide tools for patients to interact with their own health information, treatment team members, and insurance companies. However, research suggests that Black American patients have greater concerns over a lack of support, loss of privacy, and reduced personalization of care compared with other Americans, which results in a disparity of portal use. Objective: This qualitative investigation of primary care experiences of Black Americans from across the United States who participated in remote focus groups in April and May 2020 aims to explore the use and perceived value of patient portals to better understand any barriers to optimized treatment in the primary care setting. Methods: We performed an inductive thematic analysis of 8 remote focus group interviews with 29 Black American patients aged 30-60 years to qualitatively assess the experiences of Black American patients with regular access to portals. Results: Thematic analysis uncovered the following interrelated themes regarding patient portals in primary care: the optimization of care, patient empowerment, patient-provider communication, and patient burden. Conclusions: In contrast to what has been described regarding the reluctance of Black Americans to engage with patient portals, our focus groups revealed the general acceptance of patient portals, which were described overwhelmingly as tools with the potential for providing exceptional, personalized care that may even work to mitigate the unfair burden of disease for Black Americans in primary care settings. Thus, opportunities for better health care will clearly arise with increased communication, experience, and adoption of remote health care practices among Black Americans.
KW - Health belief model
KW - Health disparities
KW - Health promotion
KW - Patient engagement
KW - Technology acceptance model
KW - Telehealth
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107398879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107398879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2196/27820
DO - 10.2196/27820
M3 - Article
C2 - 34081016
AN - SCOPUS:85107398879
SN - 1439-4456
VL - 23
JO - Journal of medical Internet research
JF - Journal of medical Internet research
IS - 6
M1 - e27820
ER -