TY - JOUR
T1 - OpTrust
T2 - Validity of a Tool Assessing Intraoperative Entrustment Behaviors
AU - Sandhu, Gurjit
AU - Nikolian, Vahagn C.
AU - Magas, Christopher P.
AU - Stansfield, Robert B.
AU - Sutzko, Danielle C.
AU - Prabhu, Kaustubh
AU - Matusko, Niki
AU - Minter, Rebecca M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project is supported by The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation (Board Grant #B15-05) and the University of Michigan Graduate Medical Education Innovations Grant. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB NO. HUM00084551) provided ethical approval for this study.
Funding Information:
From the *Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; †Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; zWayne State University School of Medicine, Graduate Medical Edu-cation office, Troy, MI; §University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI; and ôSection of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Disclosure: This project is supported by The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation (Board Grant #B15-05) and the University of Michigan Graduate Medical Education Innovations Grant. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB NO. HUM00084551) provided ethical approval for this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Reprints: Gurjit Sandhu, PhD, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2207 Taubman Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, SPC 5346, Ann Arbor, MI. E-mail: gurjit@umich.edu. Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0003-4932/17/26704-0670 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002235
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study is to establish evidence to support the validity of a novel faculty-resident intraoperative assessment tool for entrustment known as OpTrust. Background: Recently, the landscape of surgical training has been altered, in part, because of resident work-hour changes and increased supervision requirements. To address these concerns, a new model for assessment of teaching and learning in surgical residencies must be anchored on progression through milestones and entrustment. Methods: OpTrust was designed to assess the faculty-resident dyad in the operating room and measure the entrustment exhibited during intraoperative interactions across 5 domains: (i) types of questions asked, (ii) operative plan, (iii) instruction, (iv) problem solving, and (v) leadership by the surgical resident. After initial pilot testing and refinement of OpTrust, 5 individual raters underwent rater training sessions; 49 individual operating room observations were completed based on 28 cases. Results: OpTrust, as a tool for assessing intraoperative entrustment, is supported by strong validity evidence. In part, it demonstrates strong interrater reliability across all faculty domains as measured by intraclass correlation 1 (ICC1) (0.81-0.93). For resident domains the results were similar with ICC1 (0.84-0.94). Cronbach alpha was 0.89 and 0.87 for faculty and resident entrustment respectively, signifying the 5 domains could be combined into a single construct of entrustment. A high correlation existed between faculty and resident scores (Pearson r = 0.94, P < 0.001) indicating a strong positive linear relationship between faculty and resident mean entrustment scores across all scale domains. Conclusions: OpTrust successfully assesses behaviors associated with entrustment during intraoperative faculty-resident interactions, and has the potential to be adopted across other procedural-based specialties to promote autonomous training progression.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study is to establish evidence to support the validity of a novel faculty-resident intraoperative assessment tool for entrustment known as OpTrust. Background: Recently, the landscape of surgical training has been altered, in part, because of resident work-hour changes and increased supervision requirements. To address these concerns, a new model for assessment of teaching and learning in surgical residencies must be anchored on progression through milestones and entrustment. Methods: OpTrust was designed to assess the faculty-resident dyad in the operating room and measure the entrustment exhibited during intraoperative interactions across 5 domains: (i) types of questions asked, (ii) operative plan, (iii) instruction, (iv) problem solving, and (v) leadership by the surgical resident. After initial pilot testing and refinement of OpTrust, 5 individual raters underwent rater training sessions; 49 individual operating room observations were completed based on 28 cases. Results: OpTrust, as a tool for assessing intraoperative entrustment, is supported by strong validity evidence. In part, it demonstrates strong interrater reliability across all faculty domains as measured by intraclass correlation 1 (ICC1) (0.81-0.93). For resident domains the results were similar with ICC1 (0.84-0.94). Cronbach alpha was 0.89 and 0.87 for faculty and resident entrustment respectively, signifying the 5 domains could be combined into a single construct of entrustment. A high correlation existed between faculty and resident scores (Pearson r = 0.94, P < 0.001) indicating a strong positive linear relationship between faculty and resident mean entrustment scores across all scale domains. Conclusions: OpTrust successfully assesses behaviors associated with entrustment during intraoperative faculty-resident interactions, and has the potential to be adopted across other procedural-based specialties to promote autonomous training progression.
KW - assessment
KW - autonomy
KW - entrustment
KW - intraoperative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016100471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016100471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002235
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002235
M3 - Article
C2 - 28350564
AN - SCOPUS:85016100471
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 267
SP - 670
EP - 676
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -