TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of treatment and monitoring of posterior teeth with cracks
T2 - three-year results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
AU - Ferracane, Jack L.
AU - Hilton, Thomas J.
AU - Funkhouser, Ellen
AU - Gordan, Valeria V.
AU - Gilbert, Gregg H.
AU - Mungia, Rahma
AU - Burton, Vanessa
AU - Meyerowitz, Cyril
AU - Kopycka-Kedzierawski, Dorota T.
AU - Group, National Dental Pbrn Collaborative
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH/NIDCR grants U19-DE-28717 and U19-DE-22516. Opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as necessarily representing the views of the respective organizations or the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objectives: To describe treatment and monitoring outcomes of posterior teeth with cracks at baseline followed in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network for up to three years. Materials and methods: Two hundred and nine dentists enrolled a convenience sample of 2,858 patients, each with a posterior tooth with at least one visible crack and followed them for three years. Characteristics at the patient, tooth, and crack level were recorded at baseline and at annual recall visits. Data on all teeth referred for extraction were reviewed. Data on all other teeth, treated or monitored, seen at one or more recall visits were reviewed for evidence of failure (subsequent extraction, endodontics, or recommendation for a re-treatment). Results: The survival rate for teeth with cracks at baseline exceeded 98% (only 37 extractions), and the failure rate for teeth that were treated restoratively was only 14%. Also, only about 14% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring were later recommended to be treated, and about 6.5% of teeth recommended for monitoring at baseline were later treated without a specific recommendation. Thus, about 80% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring continued with a monitoring recommendation throughout the entire three years of the study. Treatment failures were associated with intracoronal restorations (vs. full or partial coverage) and male patients. Conclusions: In this large 3-year practice-based study conducted across the USA, the survival rate of posterior teeth with a visible crack exceeded 85%. Clinical relevance Dentists can effectively evaluate patient-, tooth-, and crack-level characteristics to determine which teeth with cracks warrant treatment and which only warrant monitoring.
AB - Objectives: To describe treatment and monitoring outcomes of posterior teeth with cracks at baseline followed in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network for up to three years. Materials and methods: Two hundred and nine dentists enrolled a convenience sample of 2,858 patients, each with a posterior tooth with at least one visible crack and followed them for three years. Characteristics at the patient, tooth, and crack level were recorded at baseline and at annual recall visits. Data on all teeth referred for extraction were reviewed. Data on all other teeth, treated or monitored, seen at one or more recall visits were reviewed for evidence of failure (subsequent extraction, endodontics, or recommendation for a re-treatment). Results: The survival rate for teeth with cracks at baseline exceeded 98% (only 37 extractions), and the failure rate for teeth that were treated restoratively was only 14%. Also, only about 14% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring were later recommended to be treated, and about 6.5% of teeth recommended for monitoring at baseline were later treated without a specific recommendation. Thus, about 80% of teeth recommended at baseline for monitoring continued with a monitoring recommendation throughout the entire three years of the study. Treatment failures were associated with intracoronal restorations (vs. full or partial coverage) and male patients. Conclusions: In this large 3-year practice-based study conducted across the USA, the survival rate of posterior teeth with a visible crack exceeded 85%. Clinical relevance Dentists can effectively evaluate patient-, tooth-, and crack-level characteristics to determine which teeth with cracks warrant treatment and which only warrant monitoring.
KW - Cracked teeth
KW - Extraction
KW - Failure
KW - Practice-based research
KW - Restoration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116586877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116586877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00784-021-04211-0
DO - 10.1007/s00784-021-04211-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 34628545
AN - SCOPUS:85116586877
SN - 1432-6981
VL - 26
SP - 2453
EP - 2463
JO - Clinical oral investigations
JF - Clinical oral investigations
IS - 3
ER -