TY - JOUR
T1 - Patients’ adaptations after acute respiratory distress syndrome
T2 - A qualitative study
AU - for the Prevention Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network
AU - Hauschildt, Katrina E.
AU - Seigworth, Claire
AU - Kamphuis, Lee A.
AU - Hough, Catherine L.
AU - Moss, Marc
AU - McPeake, Joanne M.
AU - Harrod, Molly
AU - Iwashyna, Theodore J.
N1 - Funding Information:
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES This work was supported by grants U01 HL123031 and R01 HL132232 from the National Institutes of Health. This work does not represent the official position of the United States Government or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background Many patients confront physical, cognitive, and emotional problems after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). No proven therapies for these problems exist, and many patients manage new disability and recovery with little formal support. Eliciting patients’ adaptations to these problems after hospitalization may identify opportunities to improve recovery. Objectives To explore how patients adapt to physical, cognitive, and emotional changes related to hospitalization for ARDS. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted after hospitalization in patients with ARDS who had received mechanical ventilation. This was an ancillary study to a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Consecutive surviving patients who spoke English, consented to follow-up, and had been randomized between November 12, 2017, and April 5, 2018 were interviewed 9 to 16 months after that. Results Forty-six of 79 eligible patients (58%) participated (mean [range] age, 55 [20-84] years). All patients reported using strategies to address physical, emotional, or cognitive problems after hospitalization. For physical and cognitive problems, patients reported accommodative strategies for adapting to new disabilities and recuperative strategies for recovering previous ability. For emotional issues, no clear distinction between accommodative and recuperative strategies emerged. Social support and previous familiarity with the health care system helped patients generate and use many strategies. Thirty-one of 46 patients reported at least 1 persistent problem for which they had no acceptable adaptation. Conclusions Patients employed various strategies to manage problems after ARDS. More work is needed to identify and disseminate effective strategies to patients and their families. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2021; 30:221-229).
AB - Background Many patients confront physical, cognitive, and emotional problems after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). No proven therapies for these problems exist, and many patients manage new disability and recovery with little formal support. Eliciting patients’ adaptations to these problems after hospitalization may identify opportunities to improve recovery. Objectives To explore how patients adapt to physical, cognitive, and emotional changes related to hospitalization for ARDS. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted after hospitalization in patients with ARDS who had received mechanical ventilation. This was an ancillary study to a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Consecutive surviving patients who spoke English, consented to follow-up, and had been randomized between November 12, 2017, and April 5, 2018 were interviewed 9 to 16 months after that. Results Forty-six of 79 eligible patients (58%) participated (mean [range] age, 55 [20-84] years). All patients reported using strategies to address physical, emotional, or cognitive problems after hospitalization. For physical and cognitive problems, patients reported accommodative strategies for adapting to new disabilities and recuperative strategies for recovering previous ability. For emotional issues, no clear distinction between accommodative and recuperative strategies emerged. Social support and previous familiarity with the health care system helped patients generate and use many strategies. Thirty-one of 46 patients reported at least 1 persistent problem for which they had no acceptable adaptation. Conclusions Patients employed various strategies to manage problems after ARDS. More work is needed to identify and disseminate effective strategies to patients and their families. (American Journal of Critical Care. 2021; 30:221-229).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105867973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105867973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4037/ajcc2021825
DO - 10.4037/ajcc2021825
M3 - Article
C2 - 34161982
AN - SCOPUS:85105867973
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 30
SP - 221
EP - 229
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 3
ER -