@article{9c666c36fb3a4f97b1f9a4df2820aa48,
title = "Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Evaluate Standard Magnesium Sulfate Treatments and Alternative Dosing Regimens for Women With Preeclampsia",
abstract = "Magnesium sulfate is the standard therapy for prevention and treatment of eclampsia. Two standard dosing regimens require either continuous intravenous infusion or frequent, large-volume intramuscular injections, which may preclude patients from receiving optimal care. This project sought to identify alternative, potentially more convenient, but similarly effective dosing regimens that could be used in restrictive clinical settings. A 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to characterize serial PK data from 92 pregnant women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate. Body weight and serum creatinine concentration had a significant impact on magnesium PK. The final PK model was used to simulate magnesium concentration profiles for the 2 standard regimens and several simplified alternative dosing regimens. The simulations suggest that intravenous regimens with loading doses of 8 g over 60 minutes followed by 2 g/h for 10 hours and 12 g over 120 minutes followed by 2 g/h for 8 hours (same total dose as the standard intravenous regimen but shorter treatment duration) would result in magnesium concentrations below the toxic range. For the intramuscular regimens, higher maintenance doses given less frequently (4 g intravenously + 10-g intramuscular loading doses with maintenance doses of 8 g every 6 hours or 10 g every 8 hours for 24 hours) or removal of the intravenous loading dose (eg, 10 g intramusculary every 8 hours for 24 hours) may be reasonable alternatives. In addition, individualized dose adjustments based on body weight and serum creatinine were proposed for the standard regimens.",
keywords = "alternative dosing regimens, magnesium sulfate, modeling and simulation, population pharmacokinetics, preeclampsia",
author = "Lihong Du and Larissa Wenning and Elizabeth Migoya and Yan Xu and Brendan Carvalho and Kathleen Brookfield and Han Witjes and {de Greef}, Rik and Pisake Lumbiganon and Ussanee Sangkomkamhang and Vitaya Titapant and Lelia Duley and Qian Long and Oladapo, {Olufemi T.}",
note = "Funding Information: All authors declare no conflicts of interest. Yan Xu and Elizabeth Migoya were employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, at the time the work was being conducted. Medical writing was coordinated and supported by Certara Strategic Consulting and Medical Writing Innovations, LLC. Funding Information: This study was sponsored by Merck for Mothers (a philanthropic initiative of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., USA, known outside the United States as Merck Sharpe & Dohme [MSD]) and the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. The authors acknowledge Priya Agrawal (Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey), Jeffrey Jacobs (Merck for Mothers), A. Metin G?lmezoglu (UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction [HRP], Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland). The authors thank the women who participated in the clinical trial and the investigators and their staff at the clinical study site for their valuable contributions. This study was sponsored by Merck for Mothers (a philanthropic initiative of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., USA, known outside the United States as Merck Sharpe & Dohme [MSD]) and the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. The authors are unable to share the data supporting the results of this study. Lihong Du contributed to protocol design, population PK modeling, data interpretation, manuscript writing, and statistical analysis. L.W. supervised L.D. E.M. contributed to protocol design and overall analysis planning. Y.X. contributed to protocol design, analysis plan, and manuscript review. B.C. contributed PK raw data and data interpretation. K.B. contributed PK raw data and data interpretation. H.W. developed models and manuscript outline. R.D. supervised H.W. P.L. contributed with manuscript review and data interpretation. U.S. contributed with manuscript review and data interpretation. V.T. contributed with manuscript review and data interpretation. Q.L. contributed to project coordination, simulation scenarios, and data interpretation. O.O. contributed to project leadership and coordination, simulation scenarios, and data interpretation. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of this manuscript. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1002/jcph.1328",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "374--385",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0091-2700",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",
}