TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of delayed therapy after expectant management for localized prostate cancer in the era of prostate-specific antigen
AU - Panagiotou, Irene
AU - Beer, Tomasz M.
AU - Hsieh, Yi Ching
AU - Mori, Motomi (Tomi)
AU - Peters, Laura
AU - Klein, Thomas
AU - Garzotto, Mark
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Objective: To identify risk factors for delayed cancer-directed intervention in modern era prostate cancer patients who initially elect expectant management. Materials and Methods: An observational, cohort study of expectantly managed patients, diagnosed with clinical T1-4N xM0 prostate cancer between 1993 and 2000 was carried out. Data including TNM stage, age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound, Gleason score, percent biopsies positive for cancer, imaging results, initial treatment selection, and outcome data were collected on all patients. Results: 192 of 561 patients (34.3%) elected expectant management, and follow-up data were available for 187 (97.4%) patients. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 90 (48.1%) patients had a cancer-directed intervention. Gleason score (p = 0.0097) and percent of positive biopsy cores (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of time to intervention. As expected, PSA doubling time became the most significant predictor of intervention (p = 0.0057) when added to the model. These independent covariates are able to characterize low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for cancer-directed intervention. Conclusions: Cancer-directed intervention is common in patients who choose expectant management in the PSA era. Gleason score and percent of positive biopsy cores predict cancer-directed interventions, thus, these patients may be least suitable for expectant management.
AB - Objective: To identify risk factors for delayed cancer-directed intervention in modern era prostate cancer patients who initially elect expectant management. Materials and Methods: An observational, cohort study of expectantly managed patients, diagnosed with clinical T1-4N xM0 prostate cancer between 1993 and 2000 was carried out. Data including TNM stage, age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound, Gleason score, percent biopsies positive for cancer, imaging results, initial treatment selection, and outcome data were collected on all patients. Results: 192 of 561 patients (34.3%) elected expectant management, and follow-up data were available for 187 (97.4%) patients. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 90 (48.1%) patients had a cancer-directed intervention. Gleason score (p = 0.0097) and percent of positive biopsy cores (p = 0.03) were independent predictors of time to intervention. As expected, PSA doubling time became the most significant predictor of intervention (p = 0.0057) when added to the model. These independent covariates are able to characterize low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for cancer-directed intervention. Conclusions: Cancer-directed intervention is common in patients who choose expectant management in the PSA era. Gleason score and percent of positive biopsy cores predict cancer-directed interventions, thus, these patients may be least suitable for expectant management.
KW - Androgen deprivation
KW - Expectant management
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9244244291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9244244291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000081317
DO - 10.1159/000081317
M3 - Article
C2 - 15557778
AN - SCOPUS:9244244291
SN - 0030-2414
VL - 67
SP - 194
EP - 202
JO - Oncology
JF - Oncology
IS - 3-4
ER -