TY - JOUR
T1 - Pressure ulcer treatment strategies
T2 - A systematic comparative effectiveness review
AU - Beth Smith, M. E.
AU - Totten, Annette
AU - Hickam, David H.
AU - Fu, Rongwei
AU - Wasson, Ngoc
AU - Rahman, Basmah
AU - Motu'apuaka, Makalapua
AU - Saha, Somnath
PY - 2013/7/2
Y1 - 2013/7/2
N2 - Background: Pressure ulcers affect as many as 3 million Americans and are major sources of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Purpose: To summarize evidence comparing the effectiveness and safety of treatment strategies for adults with pressure ulcers. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Health Technology Assessment Database for English- or foreign-language studies; reference lists; gray literature; and individual product packets from manufacturers (January 1985 to October 2012). Study Selection: Randomized trials and comparative observational studies of treatments for pressure ulcers in adults and noncomparative intervention series (n > 50) for surgical interventions and evaluation of harms. Data Extraction: Data were extracted and evaluated for accuracy of the extraction, quality of included studies, and strength of evidence. Data Synthesis: 174 studies met inclusion criteria and 92 evaluated complete wound healing. In comparison with standard care, placebo, or sham interventions, moderate-strength evidence showed that air-fluidized beds (5 studies [n = 908]; high consistency), protein-containing nutritional supplements (12 studies [n = 562]; high consistency), radiant heat dressings (4 studies [n = 160]; moderate consistency), and electrical stimulation (9 studies [n = 397]; moderate consistency) improved healing of pressure ulcers. Low-strength evidence showed that alternating-pressure surfaces, hydrocolloid dressings, platelet-derived growth factor, and light therapy improved healing of pressure ulcers. The evidence about harms was limited. Limitation: Applicability of results is limited by study quality, heterogeneity in methods and outcomes, and inadequate duration to assess complete wound healing. Conclusion: Moderate-strength evidence shows that healing of pressure ulcers in adults is improved with the use of air-fluidized beds, protein supplementation, radiant heat dressings, and electrical stimulation.
AB - Background: Pressure ulcers affect as many as 3 million Americans and are major sources of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Purpose: To summarize evidence comparing the effectiveness and safety of treatment strategies for adults with pressure ulcers. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Health Technology Assessment Database for English- or foreign-language studies; reference lists; gray literature; and individual product packets from manufacturers (January 1985 to October 2012). Study Selection: Randomized trials and comparative observational studies of treatments for pressure ulcers in adults and noncomparative intervention series (n > 50) for surgical interventions and evaluation of harms. Data Extraction: Data were extracted and evaluated for accuracy of the extraction, quality of included studies, and strength of evidence. Data Synthesis: 174 studies met inclusion criteria and 92 evaluated complete wound healing. In comparison with standard care, placebo, or sham interventions, moderate-strength evidence showed that air-fluidized beds (5 studies [n = 908]; high consistency), protein-containing nutritional supplements (12 studies [n = 562]; high consistency), radiant heat dressings (4 studies [n = 160]; moderate consistency), and electrical stimulation (9 studies [n = 397]; moderate consistency) improved healing of pressure ulcers. Low-strength evidence showed that alternating-pressure surfaces, hydrocolloid dressings, platelet-derived growth factor, and light therapy improved healing of pressure ulcers. The evidence about harms was limited. Limitation: Applicability of results is limited by study quality, heterogeneity in methods and outcomes, and inadequate duration to assess complete wound healing. Conclusion: Moderate-strength evidence shows that healing of pressure ulcers in adults is improved with the use of air-fluidized beds, protein supplementation, radiant heat dressings, and electrical stimulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879574623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879574623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00007
DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23817703
AN - SCOPUS:84879574623
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 159
SP - 39
EP - 50
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 1
ER -