TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric analysis of the leadership environment scale (LENS)
T2 - Outcome from the Oregon research initiative on the organisation of nursing (ORION)
AU - Ross, Amy M.
AU - Ilic, Kelley
AU - Kiyoshi-Teo, Hiroko
AU - Lee, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Aim: The purpose of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the new 16-item leadership environment scale. Background: The leadership environment scale was based on complexity science concepts relevant to complex adaptive health care systems. Methods: A workforce survey of direct-care nurses was conducted (n = 1,443) in Oregon. Confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, concordant validity test and reliability tests were conducted to establish the structure and internal consistency of the leadership environment scale. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indices approached acceptable thresholds of fit with a single factor solution. Exploratory factor analysis showed improved fit with a two-factor model solution; the factors were labelled ‘influencing relationships’ and ‘interdependent system supports’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was observed between the leadership environment scale/subscales and both the nursing workforce index and the safety organising scale. Reliability of the leadership environment scale and subscales was strong, with all alphas ≥.85. Conclusions: The leadership environment scale is structurally sound and reliable. Implications for Nursing Management: Nursing management can employ adaptive complexity leadership attributes, measure their influence on the leadership environment, subsequently modify system supports and relationships and improve the quality of health care systems. The leadership environment scale is an innovative fit to complex adaptive systems and how nurses act as leaders within these systems.
AB - Aim: The purpose of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the new 16-item leadership environment scale. Background: The leadership environment scale was based on complexity science concepts relevant to complex adaptive health care systems. Methods: A workforce survey of direct-care nurses was conducted (n = 1,443) in Oregon. Confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, concordant validity test and reliability tests were conducted to establish the structure and internal consistency of the leadership environment scale. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indices approached acceptable thresholds of fit with a single factor solution. Exploratory factor analysis showed improved fit with a two-factor model solution; the factors were labelled ‘influencing relationships’ and ‘interdependent system supports’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was observed between the leadership environment scale/subscales and both the nursing workforce index and the safety organising scale. Reliability of the leadership environment scale and subscales was strong, with all alphas ≥.85. Conclusions: The leadership environment scale is structurally sound and reliable. Implications for Nursing Management: Nursing management can employ adaptive complexity leadership attributes, measure their influence on the leadership environment, subsequently modify system supports and relationships and improve the quality of health care systems. The leadership environment scale is an innovative fit to complex adaptive systems and how nurses act as leaders within these systems.
KW - complex adaptive systems
KW - leadership environment
KW - nursing workforce index
KW - practice environment
KW - safety organising scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038894861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038894861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jonm.12572
DO - 10.1111/jonm.12572
M3 - Article
C2 - 29277942
AN - SCOPUS:85038894861
SN - 0966-0429
VL - 26
SP - 467
EP - 476
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
JF - Journal of Nursing Management
IS - 4
ER -